Hello Mr. Dugin. I'm an Eastern European who spent half of his life in the " good ol' USA ", born under socialism-communism. While I'm against the war/violence, I understand perfect what you say/mean. Any nation/state has not only the ' right ', but the obligation/duty to protect its self (its people). If someone (person/individual or group/nation) is violent and attacks you, or poses a threat to you, then you must protect yourself by any means, including through violence. WHY ?! Simple: because the only language a thug understand is violence. An example for the other readers: I have posted my opinion on Amazon, regarding the book ' American Sniper ' (Chris Kyle) and I was called all kind of names...That those ' savages ' deserve to be killed, that being an immigrant in US, I don't understand how this ' Great Country ' became what it is (through violence) and so on. BTW, I was banned on Amazon (all 30 reviews) in Aug. 2019, because the so-called ' Amazon community ' noticed something suspect about my profile. PS: there is not going to be pace on Earth until we'll stop the Anglo-America-Zionist war /usury machine. Who believes that this could be achieved through peaceful means (vote, protests, demonstrations, etc.) is naive/gullible at best and/or cretin/imbecile at worst.
Yeah... God's been preparing to solve a lot of manmade mess for quite sometime now... A war to end all wars... and probably usury, suffering, oppression and evil... Call it the west vs east... the good vs bad... muslim/christians vs isreal/christians... power vs gog anf magog... etc. etc. And soon too! Soon!
Based on what some of other readers have posted, I think that they are the same people who don't understand ' The 2nd Amendment ' and why the most ardent supporters are people born under the totalitarian regimes. The right to possess a firearm is stipulated in the 2nd Amendment not for hunting, not for sport or ' fun ', but against a tyrannical Government (and for individual protection against criminals, on the streets or in the Congress...just saying). If some of you guys are willing " to turn the other cheek ", it's your business; just don't ask the others to do the same ( like with the CONvid jabs ). Because I'm not going to do it, on the contrary: I will hit you back (you use the palm, I'll use the fist). PS: would be nice to live in a World without violence (without born ' defective' people, like Andrew Lobaczewski & Co. proved in his/their book ' Political Ponerology '), but unfortunately, we're not there. Because those 25% of psychopaths (defective born people, born without conscience) are (as AL and his group proved) attracted to the power positions. I remember what John Lennon said: “Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it.” He was assassinated for his thinking by the same cabal which orchestrated the ' public executions of JFK, RFK, MLK-Jr, Malcom X and others, including the last one ( Charlie Kirk ).
No. This idea of a nations right to fight is misleading, rather it should be interpreted as ‘the Politicians and Military’s ‘right’ to fight (instigate hatred and war via power politics). We the people (at least some of us) see through this ‘chaos’. USA; Russia; whoever it might be. They all manipulate, lie, maneuver, meddle, etc. The Peoples wish for peace. The Politicians, Oligarchs etc. press for War. The peoples have a ‘right’ to ‘peace’. The rest are convinced of their ‘right’ to power. That’s where we are.
When a nation like US., Russia, Europe etc. sets into motion a war it is the general populace who are subjugated and forced against their will to fight.
The rise of Fascism or totalitarianism is engineered by those who have access to power who state that they have a ‘right’ to ‘cause’ War in order to smash ‘freedom’. Therefore the term / word ‘right’ is being misused / manipulated by Dugin and the rest.
No, you’re not right here, mr. Dugin. Everyone, including States have the right to be left alone. However, I support Russia’ SMO because it was an act of self defense. And of course many Western lawyers will argue that art 51 of the UN charter does not apply here. Fine, I disagree. Also natural law, moral philosophy and game theory support Russia’s position.
Do you know how many wars US & NATO started after the WWII and caused by clandestine operations?
This is the reason why US, or to be more exact Western empire (lead by City of London) lost its right to be left alone. It is time that all those wars end.
Russia didn't start the war in Ukraine. And Russia didn't expand its military presence through Europe. NATO, i.e. West did!
Okay; I do only legal and scientific explorations on war. My opinion: the SMO was justified under article 51 UN charter and the best choice under game theory.!
Hello Mr. Dugin. I'm an Eastern European who spent half of his life in the " good ol' USA ", born under socialism-communism. While I'm against the war/violence, I understand perfect what you say/mean. Any nation/state has not only the ' right ', but the obligation/duty to protect its self (its people). If someone (person/individual or group/nation) is violent and attacks you, or poses a threat to you, then you must protect yourself by any means, including through violence. WHY ?! Simple: because the only language a thug understand is violence. An example for the other readers: I have posted my opinion on Amazon, regarding the book ' American Sniper ' (Chris Kyle) and I was called all kind of names...That those ' savages ' deserve to be killed, that being an immigrant in US, I don't understand how this ' Great Country ' became what it is (through violence) and so on. BTW, I was banned on Amazon (all 30 reviews) in Aug. 2019, because the so-called ' Amazon community ' noticed something suspect about my profile. PS: there is not going to be pace on Earth until we'll stop the Anglo-America-Zionist war /usury machine. Who believes that this could be achieved through peaceful means (vote, protests, demonstrations, etc.) is naive/gullible at best and/or cretin/imbecile at worst.
Yeah... God's been preparing to solve a lot of manmade mess for quite sometime now... A war to end all wars... and probably usury, suffering, oppression and evil... Call it the west vs east... the good vs bad... muslim/christians vs isreal/christians... power vs gog anf magog... etc. etc. And soon too! Soon!
Why can't I edit my own comments here?... 😮💨
Based on what some of other readers have posted, I think that they are the same people who don't understand ' The 2nd Amendment ' and why the most ardent supporters are people born under the totalitarian regimes. The right to possess a firearm is stipulated in the 2nd Amendment not for hunting, not for sport or ' fun ', but against a tyrannical Government (and for individual protection against criminals, on the streets or in the Congress...just saying). If some of you guys are willing " to turn the other cheek ", it's your business; just don't ask the others to do the same ( like with the CONvid jabs ). Because I'm not going to do it, on the contrary: I will hit you back (you use the palm, I'll use the fist). PS: would be nice to live in a World without violence (without born ' defective' people, like Andrew Lobaczewski & Co. proved in his/their book ' Political Ponerology '), but unfortunately, we're not there. Because those 25% of psychopaths (defective born people, born without conscience) are (as AL and his group proved) attracted to the power positions. I remember what John Lennon said: “Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it.” He was assassinated for his thinking by the same cabal which orchestrated the ' public executions of JFK, RFK, MLK-Jr, Malcom X and others, including the last one ( Charlie Kirk ).
To all commentators but especially Dugin.
No. This idea of a nations right to fight is misleading, rather it should be interpreted as ‘the Politicians and Military’s ‘right’ to fight (instigate hatred and war via power politics). We the people (at least some of us) see through this ‘chaos’. USA; Russia; whoever it might be. They all manipulate, lie, maneuver, meddle, etc. The Peoples wish for peace. The Politicians, Oligarchs etc. press for War. The peoples have a ‘right’ to ‘peace’. The rest are convinced of their ‘right’ to power. That’s where we are.
When a nation like US., Russia, Europe etc. sets into motion a war it is the general populace who are subjugated and forced against their will to fight.
The rise of Fascism or totalitarianism is engineered by those who have access to power who state that they have a ‘right’ to ‘cause’ War in order to smash ‘freedom’. Therefore the term / word ‘right’ is being misused / manipulated by Dugin and the rest.
No, you’re not right here, mr. Dugin. Everyone, including States have the right to be left alone. However, I support Russia’ SMO because it was an act of self defense. And of course many Western lawyers will argue that art 51 of the UN charter does not apply here. Fine, I disagree. Also natural law, moral philosophy and game theory support Russia’s position.
Do you know how many wars US & NATO started after the WWII and caused by clandestine operations?
This is the reason why US, or to be more exact Western empire (lead by City of London) lost its right to be left alone. It is time that all those wars end.
Russia didn't start the war in Ukraine. And Russia didn't expand its military presence through Europe. NATO, i.e. West did!
I have the impression you missed my point. See my latest post.
Okay; I do only legal and scientific explorations on war. My opinion: the SMO was justified under article 51 UN charter and the best choice under game theory.!
Penso che Putin con l'operazione speciale abbia ripreso il controllo del sul Paese