7 Comments
User's avatar
Katharia's avatar

Problem is, the idea that Russia is for a multipolar world while at the same time about preserving traditional values are at odds. This theory hence, doesn’t make sense.

Expand full comment
John Curtis L. Dunn's avatar

No more than conceiving a nation's liberty to be giving birth to a “self evident truth” that all men are created equal.

Expand full comment
R. Toney Brooks, PhD's avatar

The notion of Holy Rus and Russia as the Third Rome, from the viewpoint of eschatology is compelling.

https://open.substack.com/pub/rationalspirituality/p/holy-rus-and-the-third-roman-empire?r=g6u5j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
John Curtis L. Dunn's avatar

Well read… “Dostoevsky believed that the Tsar and the people should form a unity. He wrote, “For the people, the tsar is not an external power, not the power of some conqueror...but a power of all the people, an all-unifying power the people themselves desired."

Expand full comment
Sutton's avatar

Thank you sir.

Expand full comment
Tone's avatar

Interesting ideas. But if Russian civilization has open state borders who will define them? What do states like Poland, Hungary, etc, that have become independent political entities have to say about this? Will they be forced to rejoin Russian civilization? By force? With state boundaries redefined once again?

Expand full comment
Blue Vir's avatar

Any way to get this without a dub?

Expand full comment