Alexander Dugin argues that Thiel distorts the concept of the Katechon by linking it to technological acceleration, while narrowly framing the Antichrist as liberal globalism.
Does the technology attract the anti-Christ, or is the technology the anti-Christ?
You would say the techno-capitalist architecture is clearly Tower of Babel.
They have False hopes and dreams in their A.I. → they are manifestly overcapitalised in multiple directions now. Also, tech is deflationary - there is a native conflict between technology and Capital in fact.
This conflict is what has been subverted through False Money since 1999 (where they proved they could do it in 1995 during Tequila crisis).
As a result, there is a False Capital element to Tech. itself, to begin with (wherein those with the most False and Absurd conceptualisations had the most success in False and Absurd contextual conditions → and now both are, (but also feel very comfortable in doing this), giving the mapping of future contextual conditions (but, as I said, they are False and Absurd and born of a native conflict)).
So then - in terms of the Anti-Christ, what does this all mean?
The metaphysics of capital - Materialism - is clearly embodied in the Capitalist - the Economic Rent seeking business structure (often using politics or regulation as an instrument of Power) is a very close swap for the politician, bureaucrat and pedophile -> the construction of dual reality systems, wherein a reality of dualistic modes of Power is constructed from a position of institutional authority or power (it is important that it is a False Power that contradicts what the individual themselves is capable of) -> an authority out of reach of the victim to understand, and creating a secondary, False Reality for the victim wherein they are given a False set of circumstances and are essentially forced under duress, politicking or psychosexual abuse, to accept that False reality. In them accepting it, the dual reality power system has been created.
It seems to also then institutionalise the victim along the same ritual prejudices, and is naturally antagonistic to Jesus Christ, which provides an out from the propositions of a deterministic psycho-power ritual.
This seems to be, ritually, the metaphysics of the materialist.
This process is predatory upon good-faith, on teleology - its targets are the 'good', the innocent, the beautiful, or nature or essence and God (when I listened to Thiel he seemed to identify this ritual I describe AS God, and identifies its target of parasitisation AS the Evil/Satan, quite shocking to openly admit this bizarre inversion) - and attempts to arrest and control energy or goodwill itself in a predatory, extractive system. It is also recursive (where it is allowed to pre-dominate it perpetuates itself like an algal bloom), and reflexive (it grows in magnitude of depth of pathology over time, as well as breadth). Is this process the anti-Christ? Does it utilise techno-capitalism as one of its arms of Power?
On the native conflict between technology and Capital - there is a very interesting phenomenon after/during the industrial revolution; where the democratisation of economic power in machinery and tools, is a force of destruction against highly vertical power hierarchies in Europe.
The vertical structures from like King-Aristocracy/Nobility-Merchant-Peasant (or whatever it is) is not as necessary, and the way this shows up is that, firstly, the entire enterprise of super-familial social conditions in post-agricultural civilisation is the development and distribution of economic power (the super-familial social conditions create politics, economics and self/other bias, under them the Jews first invent God (they make the claim that the bureaucratic administrative Hierarchy does not hold the divine), and Jesus goes on to then assert that the divine events primarily occur within the individual (the Pharisees themselves go on to claim that the social body hold moral authority in the material, while Christ accepts the material destruction of the body while asserting the inherent supremacy of the abstractions of the spirit are victory of abstract over material); but then we find that technology inherently distributes power away from the hierarchies constructed to seize and distribute economic Power.
To begin with the historical hierarchies (The analog is with the digital revolution today) unjustly seize the excess economic surplus from the new conditions - but they don’t really know what to do with it, and the surplus is not a result of anything they are doing successfully → they then go out of their way to demonstrate, with the extra loot, that they are entirely unnecessary, and, useless → Louis builds palace after palace and the most acute conceptualisation of the attitude is that the starving peasants can ‘…eat cake’.
Today, the digital revolution has provided similar circumstances in multiple domains, including political power, culture, social frameworks and so on → the historical systems (including the Global Central Banking system) have claimed that excess economic output and have immediately gone about convincing us that they are not necessary, that they play no useful role in the system, and while they experience now excess power and authority and in fact the most they have ever had, as far as they experience due to this perceived freedom; they have entered into the dangerous realm of Marie Antoinette.
Oh my you do use a lot of big words. Where in your eschatologic overview would you place the thalassacratic geopolitics that might instead affirm the truth that we are all one human family and must simply awaken to that reality and realize we must now all fairly share Mother Earth? Would you agree that the choice is between Warfare and Earth Share?
Our Lord, the Son of God Almighty, wants all humans to be saved. His Divine Love is endless. There is place in Paradise for everyone, as long as they repent and live in harmony with the divine rule (e.g. love your neighbor/enemy as you love yourself). And this earth mantra makes me think of shamanism/paganism.
Also, have you bothered to read The Nomos of the Earth, or even the shorter Land and Sea, to understand the ridiculousness of your 'sea-power projection can unify this mother earth OMG!' proposition? Btw, are you willing to post a link to your 'Award winning book'?
As soon as I see a person react to the precise, philosophical use of concepts with 'them there words are big,' It is an immediate giveaway that said accuser is overwhelmed by their own hubris, such that they refuse to do what every single thinker and writer in history has done - pick up a dictionary or, today, use something like Google search (or that tech incapable of doing or apprehending philosophy beyond it's own plagiaristic regurgitation, Ai) so as to learn how a perhaps unfamiliar concept or word is being used. Such are all the prideful who refuse to accept they may not always already know all there is that is worthy to be known. The latter, knowledge, be it of practical reason, theology or philosophical proposition, is only ever outlined by admitting the immensity of this wondrous Being that we are, as finite, embodied human beings, unable to ever reiteratively grasp, an immense non-knowledge that we must be humble and supplicate ourselves before as beings capable of spiritual and philosophical growth. This is also the conclusion of Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Be that as it may, perhaps I used a few too many 'big words' for your hubris to not again simplistically dismiss with a trite phrase that, in its commonness today, only belies the general human arrogance that sets its little, self-deceiving boat atop the sea of pridefulness that defines much of present Western, liberal-capitalist modernity.
Kafka - did you just call me a female fool? I found that is the Russian translation of Dura. If so, ouch that hurts. How unkind of you. I am no fool, i have written an award winning book titled The Earth Belongs to Everyone.
Hahaha.... see, 'I have written an AWARD WINNING BOOK!!!' Pure hubris lol. Especially in a world where it is dross that rises to the too and wins such awards.
Thank you for this enlightening clarification! To me, it seems that the whole idea that one man alone can rescue or doom the whole world is a kind of naive superstition which originates in the refusal to open the eyes for the reality of the multiverses we live in.
And yet, mathematics, which is the framework your so-called universe is running on, doesn’t show any number which would stand alone above all others! Rather, this world ergo these worlds show infinite diversity ….
I was busy for years developing a new prototype of clarinet in the Clarissono workshop in Liebelsberg, Germany, by the way, listening to all kinds of music with and without earphones by the way!
If by earthshare you mean open borders and free migration then a firm no! I regard the illegal small boat arrivals as thieves - they come here to live on benefits, free healthcare, phones, education for their kids, accommodation and much more. All in effect stolen from tax payers’ and generously donated by weak government t.
Some say Thiel is the closest person to the anti-Christ archetype. When he tries to explain himself he is sweaty and nervous. He fumbles over words. He must sense there is something wrong with what he is saying and doing.
An interesting view of true and false coalescences. Thank you, Professor.
By the way, I wish for the term "Anglo-Saxon" to disappear: it is a false veil, devised by the Anglo-Norman dynasty to divert the observers' attention. William of Normandy deposed the Anglo-Saxon rule, its administration, and all its land tenure, having placed his Norman Barons in the second level of English administration immediately below him.
And having done so, those of the Anglo-Saxons who betrayed their blood and land to help the new administration cement itself in place, the Iscariota, they betrayed too their name by permitting the Norman administration to advertise itself under the label of the deposed.
The English dynasty of approaching a millennium in age is the Anglo-Norman and some of the prominent English, Scottish and other families still holding a place at the Conference trace their origins back before 1066 to the territory of Normandy.
Today's repeating historical script is leading to the same old endings of fail or move on from this idiotic story with some new ideas and constructive leadership instead of SOS DD !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here is an interesting question.
Does the technology attract the anti-Christ, or is the technology the anti-Christ?
You would say the techno-capitalist architecture is clearly Tower of Babel.
They have False hopes and dreams in their A.I. → they are manifestly overcapitalised in multiple directions now. Also, tech is deflationary - there is a native conflict between technology and Capital in fact.
This conflict is what has been subverted through False Money since 1999 (where they proved they could do it in 1995 during Tequila crisis).
As a result, there is a False Capital element to Tech. itself, to begin with (wherein those with the most False and Absurd conceptualisations had the most success in False and Absurd contextual conditions → and now both are, (but also feel very comfortable in doing this), giving the mapping of future contextual conditions (but, as I said, they are False and Absurd and born of a native conflict)).
So then - in terms of the Anti-Christ, what does this all mean?
The metaphysics of capital - Materialism - is clearly embodied in the Capitalist - the Economic Rent seeking business structure (often using politics or regulation as an instrument of Power) is a very close swap for the politician, bureaucrat and pedophile -> the construction of dual reality systems, wherein a reality of dualistic modes of Power is constructed from a position of institutional authority or power (it is important that it is a False Power that contradicts what the individual themselves is capable of) -> an authority out of reach of the victim to understand, and creating a secondary, False Reality for the victim wherein they are given a False set of circumstances and are essentially forced under duress, politicking or psychosexual abuse, to accept that False reality. In them accepting it, the dual reality power system has been created.
It seems to also then institutionalise the victim along the same ritual prejudices, and is naturally antagonistic to Jesus Christ, which provides an out from the propositions of a deterministic psycho-power ritual.
This seems to be, ritually, the metaphysics of the materialist.
This process is predatory upon good-faith, on teleology - its targets are the 'good', the innocent, the beautiful, or nature or essence and God (when I listened to Thiel he seemed to identify this ritual I describe AS God, and identifies its target of parasitisation AS the Evil/Satan, quite shocking to openly admit this bizarre inversion) - and attempts to arrest and control energy or goodwill itself in a predatory, extractive system. It is also recursive (where it is allowed to pre-dominate it perpetuates itself like an algal bloom), and reflexive (it grows in magnitude of depth of pathology over time, as well as breadth). Is this process the anti-Christ? Does it utilise techno-capitalism as one of its arms of Power?
On the native conflict between technology and Capital - there is a very interesting phenomenon after/during the industrial revolution; where the democratisation of economic power in machinery and tools, is a force of destruction against highly vertical power hierarchies in Europe.
The vertical structures from like King-Aristocracy/Nobility-Merchant-Peasant (or whatever it is) is not as necessary, and the way this shows up is that, firstly, the entire enterprise of super-familial social conditions in post-agricultural civilisation is the development and distribution of economic power (the super-familial social conditions create politics, economics and self/other bias, under them the Jews first invent God (they make the claim that the bureaucratic administrative Hierarchy does not hold the divine), and Jesus goes on to then assert that the divine events primarily occur within the individual (the Pharisees themselves go on to claim that the social body hold moral authority in the material, while Christ accepts the material destruction of the body while asserting the inherent supremacy of the abstractions of the spirit are victory of abstract over material); but then we find that technology inherently distributes power away from the hierarchies constructed to seize and distribute economic Power.
To begin with the historical hierarchies (The analog is with the digital revolution today) unjustly seize the excess economic surplus from the new conditions - but they don’t really know what to do with it, and the surplus is not a result of anything they are doing successfully → they then go out of their way to demonstrate, with the extra loot, that they are entirely unnecessary, and, useless → Louis builds palace after palace and the most acute conceptualisation of the attitude is that the starving peasants can ‘…eat cake’.
Today, the digital revolution has provided similar circumstances in multiple domains, including political power, culture, social frameworks and so on → the historical systems (including the Global Central Banking system) have claimed that excess economic output and have immediately gone about convincing us that they are not necessary, that they play no useful role in the system, and while they experience now excess power and authority and in fact the most they have ever had, as far as they experience due to this perceived freedom; they have entered into the dangerous realm of Marie Antoinette.
Oh my you do use a lot of big words. Where in your eschatologic overview would you place the thalassacratic geopolitics that might instead affirm the truth that we are all one human family and must simply awaken to that reality and realize we must now all fairly share Mother Earth? Would you agree that the choice is between Warfare and Earth Share?
Our Lord, the Son of God Almighty, wants all humans to be saved. His Divine Love is endless. There is place in Paradise for everyone, as long as they repent and live in harmony with the divine rule (e.g. love your neighbor/enemy as you love yourself). And this earth mantra makes me think of shamanism/paganism.
Also, have you bothered to read The Nomos of the Earth, or even the shorter Land and Sea, to understand the ridiculousness of your 'sea-power projection can unify this mother earth OMG!' proposition? Btw, are you willing to post a link to your 'Award winning book'?
As soon as I see a person react to the precise, philosophical use of concepts with 'them there words are big,' It is an immediate giveaway that said accuser is overwhelmed by their own hubris, such that they refuse to do what every single thinker and writer in history has done - pick up a dictionary or, today, use something like Google search (or that tech incapable of doing or apprehending philosophy beyond it's own plagiaristic regurgitation, Ai) so as to learn how a perhaps unfamiliar concept or word is being used. Such are all the prideful who refuse to accept they may not always already know all there is that is worthy to be known. The latter, knowledge, be it of practical reason, theology or philosophical proposition, is only ever outlined by admitting the immensity of this wondrous Being that we are, as finite, embodied human beings, unable to ever reiteratively grasp, an immense non-knowledge that we must be humble and supplicate ourselves before as beings capable of spiritual and philosophical growth. This is also the conclusion of Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Be that as it may, perhaps I used a few too many 'big words' for your hubris to not again simplistically dismiss with a trite phrase that, in its commonness today, only belies the general human arrogance that sets its little, self-deceiving boat atop the sea of pridefulness that defines much of present Western, liberal-capitalist modernity.
Dura!
Kafka - did you just call me a female fool? I found that is the Russian translation of Dura. If so, ouch that hurts. How unkind of you. I am no fool, i have written an award winning book titled The Earth Belongs to Everyone.
Hahaha.... see, 'I have written an AWARD WINNING BOOK!!!' Pure hubris lol. Especially in a world where it is dross that rises to the too and wins such awards.
It means the same thing in Italian btw. Obama won an award - the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump almost got one himself and still may. Never say never.
An award such as yours casts doubt on your integrity, nothing more.
The title sucks by the way.
you are an unkind rough tough person probably carrying much personal pain and trauma. all the best for your healing journey into the light. truly.
Not always.
namaste
I see that word so often as a tatoo on peoples pitiful bodies .
Technology, Theories,Religions (not all) are only tools in the pass of centuries.
Behind all of them, the same persons with different names and passports.
Thank you for this enlightening clarification! To me, it seems that the whole idea that one man alone can rescue or doom the whole world is a kind of naive superstition which originates in the refusal to open the eyes for the reality of the multiverses we live in.
'Multiverses' [sic] are needed to house all the idiots.
And yet, mathematics, which is the framework your so-called universe is running on, doesn’t show any number which would stand alone above all others! Rather, this world ergo these worlds show infinite diversity ….
I would no more use mathematics to understand reality than I would use earplugs to understand music.
I was busy for years developing a new prototype of clarinet in the Clarissono workshop in Liebelsberg, Germany, by the way, listening to all kinds of music with and without earphones by the way!
If by earthshare you mean open borders and free migration then a firm no! I regard the illegal small boat arrivals as thieves - they come here to live on benefits, free healthcare, phones, education for their kids, accommodation and much more. All in effect stolen from tax payers’ and generously donated by weak government t.
A mio parere Peter theil si può paragonare a un bravo venditore che sta facendo soldi a palate vendendo merce avariata.
Some say Thiel is the closest person to the anti-Christ archetype. When he tries to explain himself he is sweaty and nervous. He fumbles over words. He must sense there is something wrong with what he is saying and doing.
Just look at him , spawned from something evil .
An interesting view of true and false coalescences. Thank you, Professor.
By the way, I wish for the term "Anglo-Saxon" to disappear: it is a false veil, devised by the Anglo-Norman dynasty to divert the observers' attention. William of Normandy deposed the Anglo-Saxon rule, its administration, and all its land tenure, having placed his Norman Barons in the second level of English administration immediately below him.
And having done so, those of the Anglo-Saxons who betrayed their blood and land to help the new administration cement itself in place, the Iscariota, they betrayed too their name by permitting the Norman administration to advertise itself under the label of the deposed.
The English dynasty of approaching a millennium in age is the Anglo-Norman and some of the prominent English, Scottish and other families still holding a place at the Conference trace their origins back before 1066 to the territory of Normandy.
Thanks for your time.
... and we are in interesting times!
Peter Theil, the PUPPET MASTER of JD Vance, is a LIZARD-DEMON <<< LITERALLY!!
Today's repeating historical script is leading to the same old endings of fail or move on from this idiotic story with some new ideas and constructive leadership instead of SOS DD !!!!!!!!!!!!!
In the end, all psychopaths are idiots. Thiel simply confirms the rule.
What a great saving grace it is to understand that the Mashioc is the AntiChrist.