Exposing the Woke Agenda as a tool of defamation, philosopher Alexander Dugin calls for the restoration of traditional values and the Great Return of Gender to the Natural Order.
Professor Dugin is correct. All these labels should be done with. I agree these labels make the woke liberals look normal and marginalized the right. Also may I add we've always had perversion be it porn homosexuality and what not but it was never was in your face as it is now. Yes I also say burn that gay pride flag and return to traditional values
Unfortunately, a lot of damage has already been done to a generation of young people, particularly in my country Ireland. Seeing first hand as I do, how messed up the minds of our youth are, the repercussions of woke insanity will last a long time.
Education in my country is rotten to the core, from infants to post graduates. Eliminating this insanity from the most important institution of a country will not happen overnight. Yes, the war is over, sanity may have returned stateside, but the legacy will remain and who knows what's next from the lunatics in Washington?
Hello Eoin, I think some honest introspection and reflection is necessary with regards to the real origins of wokeness/wokeism. It originates not only from liberalism as professor Dugin claims, but also from Soviet-communism. Both the East (Soviet Union Russia especially) AND the West (very much including Ireland ...) supported the biggest global woke campaign against a single country, which has since then had a boomerang effect and now everyone East and West is trying to point at each other without facing up to the monster they have created globally. WOKE has come HOME after using it for regime change elsewhere.
Here is a comment I left on another post of Prof Dugin - the linked article proves my point:
I read your previous comment on the anti apartheid movement, a movement my country brought to the fore being the first European country to boycott South African products. There might be some merit to the linking of wokeness to this movement and maybe something in what you say about the soviet system, but the fact remains that gender bending is a uniquely western invention that has systematically and deliberately replaced the fact that only two genders exist in the minds of many of our young and our easily led population.
Elite society, fuelled by mind altering drugs and free from any accountability, are the root cause of this insanity and no amount of introspection can tell me otherwise. California and then Washington pushed this madness to the limit.
All I want to know is what is the next new fad of insanity that these monsters will dream up.
Gender bending is a phenomenon that appears when a civilisation is on its last legs, it's what happened just before the Roman Empire collapsed, but it's the West collapsing right now (primarily) not the East (for now) which is why it's more evident in the West, so that's one part of it (which is a different subject, though).
In our era the *Civil Rights Movements (the anti-apartheid movement being a perfect example) played a pivotal role in the process of undermining nations (demoralising them) under the banner of "social justice", i.e. "doing good" (equality, human rights, non-racialism, etc) but the outcomes are the contrary of what was campaigned for - as is the clear case in South Africa - with the West following the same trajectory. (So, ultimately it was a Faustian pact - that's why I'm referring to introspection).
[*Gender-related movements are also civil rights movements, see clip below]
For some context to the above - keeping in mind that the party [ANC] has always been aligned with the S.A. Communist Party:
"Post-apartheid era [in South Africa]:
In 1993, the African National Congress, in the Bill of Rights,[a] endorsed the legal recognition of same-sex marriages,[31] and the interim Constitution prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. These provisions were kept in the new Constitution, approved in 1996, due to the lobbying efforts of LGBT South Africans.[32] As a result, South Africa became the first nation in the world to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in its constitution. Two years later, the Constitutional Court of South Africa ruled in a landmark case that the law prohibiting homosexual conduct between consenting adults in private violated the Constitution.
In 1994, during his inauguration speech as president, Nelson Mandela stated the following: "In 1980s the African National Congress was still setting the pace, being the first major political formation in South Africa to commit itself firmly to a Bill of Rights, which we published in November 1990. These milestones give concrete expression to what South Africa can become. They speak of a constitutional, democratic, political order in which, regardless of colour, gender, religion, political opinion or sexual orientation, the law will provide for the equal protection of all citizens." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_South_Africa [see also below]
Regarding the last paragraph above: Although it's true that South Africa strongly protects the LGBT+ communities, it openly discriminates against white people - yet the country has never been criticised by fellow-BRICS members, or by the West (or much by the citizens of either side) :
"For a few precious years in the early to mid-1990s South Africa was, for the first and last time, a country without operative racial laws. Over the past 26 years the ANC has put in place a web of binding racial requirements through constitutional provisions, legislation, white papers, regulations, charters, and party resolutions; as it has sought
to advance through the different stages of the revolution, towards the goal of pure racial proportionality, everywhere. This article has documented some eighty of these, but this is not a complete list. It lists only a handful of regulations. By one count the ANC has incorporated racial requirements into ninety acts of parliament, excluding the
Constitution, though many of these relate to the application of the “representivity” principle to the boards of statutory bodies. In addition, there are a number of judgments issued by the Constitutional Court, bending the interpretation of the Constitution in favor of the [NDR/Democratic National Revolution] national revolution."
Psycho linguistically maniacal and defective, with combination of demonic naïveté and perverted sexual obsession and pathological ferocious aggressiveness. Not just simply extremist.
First up, the DNC/Biden/Clinton/Zionazi crowd are not "Left" in any traditional sense. Do they support higher wages? Higher state welfare and pensions? Unions? Workers rights? Nationally-owned infrastructure?
No.
So what is "Left" about them? That they support Individual Rights, for minorities as well as majorities? This is a Liberal theological reason, not of the Traditional Left. It is also part of the 'soft left', social democracy fx, but it is also part of the 'soft right'. The diehard Conservatives who it turned out didn't mind their gay friends and neighbours being able to marry and be happy, fx.
Individual rights is based in Liberalism, and accepted in the softer versions of Left & Right.
So you can say that the Imperialist/Zionazi crew are Liberal. Except they ARE Authoritarian, and by definition authoritarianism opposes individual/human rights. If dissent is to be threatened, and protest is to be imprisoned, and public discussion is to be censored - as it is heavily in the USA & West - then there must exist a large, well funded bureaucracy devoted to maintaining the authoritarian state; and that certainly takes precedence over individual rights.
So they are not Traditional Left; they are not traditional Conservatives; they are not "Liberal" outside of media soundbites - what are they? Imperialist, Corporatist, Hegemonic, Racists. Yes racists - just watch the West's coverage of Gaza, and all the Imperialist wars.
Generally, Corporatism is considered a fascist ideology, both are also considered expansionist, with hegemony built-in. Corporatism however doesn't HAVE to be racist, anti-minorities, anti-women, anti-gay rights etc, but Imperialism, at least how post-Rome Europe has done it, has usually involved racism to 'justify' what would elsewise obviously be just murder and theft.
Now, it's probably just a coincidence, what with the West supporting the Nazis of Ukraine, as well as the Nazis of Israel, but all that adds up to not "Hard left", but Fascism - probably hidden Nazism. Trust me, there is very little concern for the average citizen in Western countries in the regimes, not even for homeless or pensioners in bitter winters. This is a strange form of "Communism", if we are in the grip of the "Hard Left", Professor.
However, all this would make a great deal of sense if we gingerly hold Occam's letter-opener and recall they are also pathological liars. What IF, that huge mass of Imperial machinations is not actually held together with the shared belief in transgendered children turned into post-sex posthumanoids - but simply maintaining the Atlanticist Empire through any means necessary, and expanding where possible, and who would cast aside all this Gay Rights, Wokeism, Transrights; without so much as a regretful thought if the order came down that was the way to go?
What if you - and the World - are being trolled by professional Nazis through Hollywood?
The West funded Germany's re-armament before WW2 - this fact is mentioned in NO Western history books. But who else lent them all the money?
Not everyone here is fascist, Professor, although you may think that watching the Western media - or "far-left", although most can't see the problem of letting harmless activities go ahead that benefit minorities, such as Gay Marriage, and unfortunately also individuals being worth "$Billions". There is certainly a case we are too Liberal in many respects.
And Liberalism unchecked can go too far - ESPECIALLY when it is being cynically used to hide a much darker intent, by people who are not "Liberals" in any traditional sense.
B'Liar and Clinton's "3rd Way" - 'The Left gets Words; the Right gets Actions'.
Would you like the West anymore if it completely rolled back every progressive advance of the past 40 years while STILL aggressively attacking and undermining Russia at every point around the Globe?
Would that be OK then?
Western media lies are like the F16 programme - once you've accepted the first step, you're soon sucked into a black hole.
Just imagine that the West is ruled by Nazis, who are lying about "Caring" about minorities and Progressive rights; and use NGO's - often filled with honest believers who are good people - to promote their TRUE aims, which is regime-control, and asset-strip.
I know, I KNOW, it's hard to accept Western media may be lying to such a stunning depth - how are they so capable when incompetence is prevalent elsewhere so abundantly? - but there's an old saying - "Look to what you unable to think".
The State's organs can have a profound influence upon our very thoughts, as you are very well aware, and the West's media are so tightly bound with the Class system it's almost more effective than the Soviet system.
"What if Western countries are ruled nu a Nazi clique, who lie about their far-left Liberal tendencies to seem electable?"
Correct - and totalitarianism is very much driven by the common people together with the elites (but they always blame the elites, never themselves) - as Mattias Desmet proves in his research:
"The roots of all the current “wokeness” in the world are to be found in the selective blindness of the anti-Apartheid movements [in the 1980's & 1990's]. Wokeness equals selective outrage and double standards with the objective to scapegoat. Today we can see that a lot of South Africa’s problems regarding race issues have arrived in Western Nations too, while “the woke” are demanding their own apartheid: “safe spaces”.
Most people have supported anti-Apartheid movements, but few are prepared to publicly denounce glaringly obvious discriminatory race policies against white people in South Africa in the present day."
"Some people claim that the forerunner of Western 'wokeness' and woke-ideology in general was the global anti-apartheid movement of the 80's and 90's that promoted the forced integration of 10 different cultural and linguistic groups into an artificial multicultural "utopia" (with the unspoken objective being to dilute all those cultures) under the banner of [Saint?] Nelson Mandela's "Rainbow Nation" concept in South Africa featuring "Unity in Diversity" and "Ubuntu" which were the forerunners of Western "diversity" and "inclusiveness" (*** while the New South Africa was also one of the first countries to introduce same-sex marriages ***) [+ extreme affirmative action policies], championed by the woke everywhere in the West [today]."
I do think that the recent Olympic Games in Paris have made it possible to definitively settle the issue of transsexuals in sport... and to define a clear position regarding DSD/Disorders of Sexual Development.
In our consulting activities, my colleagues at Futurous and I have worked a lot on the evolution of sport and competition formats. The recognition of the two genres is consubstantial to the nature of the sport.
The instrumentalization of the latter in a social agenda has led to the discrediting of major sports institutions.
For Russia and its BRICS partners, it is also an opportunity to reaffirm, in joint sports competitions, the true values of sport and competition.
As an example… Electricity is a powerful and helpful thing if used correctly. However, misused or abused, electricity can be deadly.
The same is true of sexuality. Misused, sex is also deadly. Abusing God’s gift produces problems such as abortion, poverty, rape, adultery, divorce, and pornography. Sexual sin begins with temptation, as all sin does. When we refuse to acknowledge God’s boundaries, we allow lust to dictate our choices. And lust never leads in the right direction. James 1:13-15 says, “Let no one say when he is tempted, ‘I am being tempted by God’; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.”
Another reason sexual sin is such a big deal is that it destroys the picture of the unbreakable covenant God has with His people. The Bible uses marriage as a metaphor to describe the covenant relationship Jesus has with His “bride,” those whom He has bought with His own blood (Revelation 19:7; 2 Corinthians 11:2). In the Old Testament, God often compared rebellious Israel to a wayward wife, using adultery as a picture of the most heinous of sins (Jeremiah 3:6). God created the sex act to be a consummation of a covenant relationship—a covenant in which God has participated (Malachi 2:14; Matthew 19:6; Mark 10:9). The marriage covenant illustrates God’s unbreakable covenant with us. To engage in sex outside of marriage violates God’s intention and brings serious consequences.
Sexual sin defiles more than just our physical bodies (1 Corinthians 6:18). It has spiritual significance. Almost every book of the Bible renounces sexual immorality, indicating that God considers it a grave sin. Committing sexual sin is directly opposed to God’s will to sanctify us (1 Thessalonians 4:3).
Romans 13:13–14 outlines the life God desires us to live: “Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in carousing and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy. Rather, clothe yourselves with the Lord Jesus Christ, and do not think about how to gratify the desires of the flesh.” Sexual sin is one more way people gratify the flesh rather than walk in the Spirit (Galatians 5:16). Jesus said that the “pure in heart” will “see God” (Matthew 5:8). Unrepentant sexual sin defiles the heart, making it impossible to experience the power of the Holy Spirit in our lives. If we wish to be pure in heart, we cannot engage in sexual sin.
My Faith and belief underscores that our creator, God, perfectly encapsulated and prescribed the basis by which we need live our lives, what we need adhere unto in order our lives be fulfilling, homosexuality, Trans, Queer, Pedophilia, Beastiality, is not condoned under any metric, by any measure, all considered perversions, just as physical abuse of our children and wives/partners is considered to me…
Those directives, clearly enunciated unequivocally stating gods law, is more than sufficient for me, good enough for the Lord to warn us against such, good enough, logical enough for us to not err by bending to our will his dik tat… period… just saying.
Kia Kaha from New Zealand
Ref and acknowledgment to GotQuestions.org… Copied for a easy to understand explanatory…
I fully concur and agree, God has designed and created as we well know and understand on the sixth and very last day of creation the two sexes, man…Adam, first then for companionship throughout life and to enable procreation…
Ref:The First Book of Moses Called Genesis…
The Book of Genesis Chapter 1:23-31
23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Further in the Book of Enoch Chapter 69 … whilst Enoch is being shown the secrets of the machinations of the heavens… we know that it was disclosed unto Enoch that as the sons of man and until we had sinned in Eden, Gadreel, being one of the 6 chiefs Jeqon, Asbeel, Gadreel, Penemue, Kasadja and Kassel, they all having been prior to their sentence proclaimed upon by them by God, for having tempted and led astray the two hundred Fallen Angels, the Watchers whose mission was upon the earth, that these six anointed and chosen by god to minister over the Angels of Heaven, whose calling was amongst those anointed Holy Angels being chief over hundreds, over fifties, over tens of Angels, that they these six, who amongst them Gadreel, had been he both had showed unto “the children of men, all the blows of death, and he led astray Eve, and showed the weapons of Death to the sons of men, the shield and the coat of mail and the sword for battle and all the weapons of death to the children of men. And from his hand they have proceeded against those who dwell on the earth from that day and for evermore…
Whilst it is written it was Penemue (he of the six it was who…
“taught the children of men the bitter and the sweet, and he taught them all the secrets of their (The Six) wisdom, And he instructed mankind in writing with ink, and paper and thereby many sinned from eternity to eternity, and until this day. For men were created exactly like the Angels, to the intent that they should continue pure and righteous and death which destroys everything could not have taken hold of them, but through this their knowledge they are perishing and through this power it is consuming me… “
Thus as written in both the Bible and the Book of Enoch, we understand and gain insight into Gods intent for man, the children of men, the son of man, woman were created for specific purpose, God giving man, Adam dominion over all living things, the intent by which we had been created clearly defined, further scripture clearly enunciates gods disdain for homosexuality, for the queer… God’s disdain as equal for men dressing in Woman’s clothing… or as like unto a woman, further still regarding pedophilia God advises unequivocally the seriousness of the sin together the punishment to be meted out unto those harming even the single hair of a child…such sin as we know is referenced frequently in Scripture…
What makes sexual sin such a big deal?
Sadly, modern culture has tried to redefine sexuality as a personal right to be exercised any way an individual wishes. Sexual behavior is considered a personal choice, akin to the decision of whether to buy a house or rent a condo. At the same time, popular opinion has all but removed the word sin from our culture’s vocabulary. The only sexual expression considered “wrong” is what is deemed distasteful to the definer. However, social acceptability varies so greatly that even the vilest of acts would be considered justified by many. So, before we can determine why sexual sin is such a big deal, we have to define sexual sin.
Fortunately, man has never been given the privilege of defining sin. The One who created sexuality also has the right to set the boundaries for it, and the Bible is clear about the guidelines. When God created the first man, Adam, and brought to him the first woman, Eve, He joined them together in marriage and pronounced it “very good” (Genesis 1:31; 2:18, 24). At that time, God introduced sexuality and set the boundaries for its expression. God created a union between a husband and wife that He called “becoming one flesh” (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:6; Mark 10:8; Ephesians 5:31). He then defined any sexual activity outside of the husband-wife relationship as a violation of His gift. Fornication, homosexuality, pornography, and lust are all violations of God’s intent when He created the sexual act (1 Corinthians 6:9,18; Galatians 5:19-20; Jude 1:7; Matthew 5:28; Hebrews 13:4).
So why is the violation of those boundaries such a big deal? The first clue lies in Genesis 2:24 with the words “one flesh.” There is great unifying power within the sexual union. God designed it to involve not only bodies but hearts and lives. Sex was designed to consummate the lifetime union between a man and woman. Jesus said, “What God has joined together let no one separate” (Matthew 19:6; Mark 10:9). He designed male and female bodies differently so that they could come together in an act of physical intimacy that joins them together for life. They “are no longer two, but one flesh” (Mark 10:8). The act of becoming one creates a new entity: a family. This powerful force also brings forth new life (Genesis 4:25). The human race can only be propagated by the coming together of a man and a woman. And, within marriage, God blesses it (Genesis 1:28; 9:27; Psalm 17:3). Sex is a gift to a husband and wife to make their relationship unique among all other relationships.
However, what God creates as good, Satan perverts. Satan began his insidious defilement in the Garden of Eden with the words “Has God said?” (Genesis 3:1). And that challenge to the authority of God continues still. When we use sexuality for entertainment or to satisfy lust, we cheapen the beauty of this powerful gift and defy the One who designed it. We also reap the consequences of our sin. Our sexual disobedience has produced a world staggering under the weight of disease, abortion, perversion, child molestation, addiction, and sexual exploitation. God created boundaries for our good so that we could enjoy His gift as it was designed to be enjoyed.
I’m not Christian nor follower of any religion or religious beliefs. I believe though, that nature created two sides that complement each other to keep creating life. If a man or a woman feels they’re something else other than their nature assigned gender that’s their personal issue, governments or “modern”societies shouldn’t force this mentality into schools or into other countries culture.
Quegli estremisti della sinistra radicalscic hanno portato il materialismo e il nichelismo all'ennesima potenza, distruggendo tutti i valori della Tradizione. Loro sono i responsabili della non-cultura, del degrado assoluto della civiltà occidentale.
Professor Dugin is correct. All these labels should be done with. I agree these labels make the woke liberals look normal and marginalized the right. Also may I add we've always had perversion be it porn homosexuality and what not but it was never was in your face as it is now. Yes I also say burn that gay pride flag and return to traditional values
Unfortunately, a lot of damage has already been done to a generation of young people, particularly in my country Ireland. Seeing first hand as I do, how messed up the minds of our youth are, the repercussions of woke insanity will last a long time.
Education in my country is rotten to the core, from infants to post graduates. Eliminating this insanity from the most important institution of a country will not happen overnight. Yes, the war is over, sanity may have returned stateside, but the legacy will remain and who knows what's next from the lunatics in Washington?
Hello Eoin, I think some honest introspection and reflection is necessary with regards to the real origins of wokeness/wokeism. It originates not only from liberalism as professor Dugin claims, but also from Soviet-communism. Both the East (Soviet Union Russia especially) AND the West (very much including Ireland ...) supported the biggest global woke campaign against a single country, which has since then had a boomerang effect and now everyone East and West is trying to point at each other without facing up to the monster they have created globally. WOKE has come HOME after using it for regime change elsewhere.
Here is a comment I left on another post of Prof Dugin - the linked article proves my point:
https://alexanderdugin.substack.com/p/the-western-modernity-is-antichrist/comment/83132907
I read your previous comment on the anti apartheid movement, a movement my country brought to the fore being the first European country to boycott South African products. There might be some merit to the linking of wokeness to this movement and maybe something in what you say about the soviet system, but the fact remains that gender bending is a uniquely western invention that has systematically and deliberately replaced the fact that only two genders exist in the minds of many of our young and our easily led population.
Elite society, fuelled by mind altering drugs and free from any accountability, are the root cause of this insanity and no amount of introspection can tell me otherwise. California and then Washington pushed this madness to the limit.
All I want to know is what is the next new fad of insanity that these monsters will dream up.
Gender bending is a phenomenon that appears when a civilisation is on its last legs, it's what happened just before the Roman Empire collapsed, but it's the West collapsing right now (primarily) not the East (for now) which is why it's more evident in the West, so that's one part of it (which is a different subject, though).
In our era the *Civil Rights Movements (the anti-apartheid movement being a perfect example) played a pivotal role in the process of undermining nations (demoralising them) under the banner of "social justice", i.e. "doing good" (equality, human rights, non-racialism, etc) but the outcomes are the contrary of what was campaigned for - as is the clear case in South Africa - with the West following the same trajectory. (So, ultimately it was a Faustian pact - that's why I'm referring to introspection).
[*Gender-related movements are also civil rights movements, see clip below]
The origins of this process did not originate in the West, though, as explained by Yuri Bezmenov in this clip (see at *05:25) on YT: https://youtu.be/0fx1BYwCwCI?si=LkOpxFi3SZsWDWmC
For some context to the above - keeping in mind that the party [ANC] has always been aligned with the S.A. Communist Party:
"Post-apartheid era [in South Africa]:
In 1993, the African National Congress, in the Bill of Rights,[a] endorsed the legal recognition of same-sex marriages,[31] and the interim Constitution prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. These provisions were kept in the new Constitution, approved in 1996, due to the lobbying efforts of LGBT South Africans.[32] As a result, South Africa became the first nation in the world to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in its constitution. Two years later, the Constitutional Court of South Africa ruled in a landmark case that the law prohibiting homosexual conduct between consenting adults in private violated the Constitution.
In 1994, during his inauguration speech as president, Nelson Mandela stated the following: "In 1980s the African National Congress was still setting the pace, being the first major political formation in South Africa to commit itself firmly to a Bill of Rights, which we published in November 1990. These milestones give concrete expression to what South Africa can become. They speak of a constitutional, democratic, political order in which, regardless of colour, gender, religion, political opinion or sexual orientation, the law will provide for the equal protection of all citizens." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_South_Africa [see also below]
Regarding the last paragraph above: Although it's true that South Africa strongly protects the LGBT+ communities, it openly discriminates against white people - yet the country has never been criticised by fellow-BRICS members, or by the West (or much by the citizens of either side) :
"For a few precious years in the early to mid-1990s South Africa was, for the first and last time, a country without operative racial laws. Over the past 26 years the ANC has put in place a web of binding racial requirements through constitutional provisions, legislation, white papers, regulations, charters, and party resolutions; as it has sought
to advance through the different stages of the revolution, towards the goal of pure racial proportionality, everywhere. This article has documented some eighty of these, but this is not a complete list. It lists only a handful of regulations. By one count the ANC has incorporated racial requirements into ninety acts of parliament, excluding the
Constitution, though many of these relate to the application of the “representivity” principle to the boards of statutory bodies. In addition, there are a number of judgments issued by the Constitutional Court, bending the interpretation of the Constitution in favor of the [NDR/Democratic National Revolution] national revolution."
https://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/the-many-many-race-laws-of-the-anc
Psycho linguistically maniacal and defective, with combination of demonic naïveté and perverted sexual obsession and pathological ferocious aggressiveness. Not just simply extremist.
Oh please Professor, lay down the bhong. ;)
First up, the DNC/Biden/Clinton/Zionazi crowd are not "Left" in any traditional sense. Do they support higher wages? Higher state welfare and pensions? Unions? Workers rights? Nationally-owned infrastructure?
No.
So what is "Left" about them? That they support Individual Rights, for minorities as well as majorities? This is a Liberal theological reason, not of the Traditional Left. It is also part of the 'soft left', social democracy fx, but it is also part of the 'soft right'. The diehard Conservatives who it turned out didn't mind their gay friends and neighbours being able to marry and be happy, fx.
Individual rights is based in Liberalism, and accepted in the softer versions of Left & Right.
So you can say that the Imperialist/Zionazi crew are Liberal. Except they ARE Authoritarian, and by definition authoritarianism opposes individual/human rights. If dissent is to be threatened, and protest is to be imprisoned, and public discussion is to be censored - as it is heavily in the USA & West - then there must exist a large, well funded bureaucracy devoted to maintaining the authoritarian state; and that certainly takes precedence over individual rights.
So they are not Traditional Left; they are not traditional Conservatives; they are not "Liberal" outside of media soundbites - what are they? Imperialist, Corporatist, Hegemonic, Racists. Yes racists - just watch the West's coverage of Gaza, and all the Imperialist wars.
Generally, Corporatism is considered a fascist ideology, both are also considered expansionist, with hegemony built-in. Corporatism however doesn't HAVE to be racist, anti-minorities, anti-women, anti-gay rights etc, but Imperialism, at least how post-Rome Europe has done it, has usually involved racism to 'justify' what would elsewise obviously be just murder and theft.
Now, it's probably just a coincidence, what with the West supporting the Nazis of Ukraine, as well as the Nazis of Israel, but all that adds up to not "Hard left", but Fascism - probably hidden Nazism. Trust me, there is very little concern for the average citizen in Western countries in the regimes, not even for homeless or pensioners in bitter winters. This is a strange form of "Communism", if we are in the grip of the "Hard Left", Professor.
However, all this would make a great deal of sense if we gingerly hold Occam's letter-opener and recall they are also pathological liars. What IF, that huge mass of Imperial machinations is not actually held together with the shared belief in transgendered children turned into post-sex posthumanoids - but simply maintaining the Atlanticist Empire through any means necessary, and expanding where possible, and who would cast aside all this Gay Rights, Wokeism, Transrights; without so much as a regretful thought if the order came down that was the way to go?
What if you - and the World - are being trolled by professional Nazis through Hollywood?
The West funded Germany's re-armament before WW2 - this fact is mentioned in NO Western history books. But who else lent them all the money?
Not everyone here is fascist, Professor, although you may think that watching the Western media - or "far-left", although most can't see the problem of letting harmless activities go ahead that benefit minorities, such as Gay Marriage, and unfortunately also individuals being worth "$Billions". There is certainly a case we are too Liberal in many respects.
And Liberalism unchecked can go too far - ESPECIALLY when it is being cynically used to hide a much darker intent, by people who are not "Liberals" in any traditional sense.
B'Liar and Clinton's "3rd Way" - 'The Left gets Words; the Right gets Actions'.
Would you like the West anymore if it completely rolled back every progressive advance of the past 40 years while STILL aggressively attacking and undermining Russia at every point around the Globe?
Would that be OK then?
Western media lies are like the F16 programme - once you've accepted the first step, you're soon sucked into a black hole.
Just imagine that the West is ruled by Nazis, who are lying about "Caring" about minorities and Progressive rights; and use NGO's - often filled with honest believers who are good people - to promote their TRUE aims, which is regime-control, and asset-strip.
I know, I KNOW, it's hard to accept Western media may be lying to such a stunning depth - how are they so capable when incompetence is prevalent elsewhere so abundantly? - but there's an old saying - "Look to what you unable to think".
The State's organs can have a profound influence upon our very thoughts, as you are very well aware, and the West's media are so tightly bound with the Class system it's almost more effective than the Soviet system.
"What if Western countries are ruled nu a Nazi clique, who lie about their far-left Liberal tendencies to seem electable?"
We know all this already. You’re missing the bigger point. It’s about TOTALITARIANISM.
Correct - and totalitarianism is very much driven by the common people together with the elites (but they always blame the elites, never themselves) - as Mattias Desmet proves in his research:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g5ub5vqtd0
Thanks. I’ll watch. I’m already familiar with Joost Meerloo, Neil Postman, Gustave Le Bon, Marshall McLuhan, Huxley, Orwell, Chomsky, etc, of course…
All well said. Thank you, Mr. Dugin.
I think that woke roots will not vanish they will went into sleepy mode to wake later on. The only solution is total eradication of perverts.
"The roots of all the current “wokeness” in the world are to be found in the selective blindness of the anti-Apartheid movements [in the 1980's & 1990's]. Wokeness equals selective outrage and double standards with the objective to scapegoat. Today we can see that a lot of South Africa’s problems regarding race issues have arrived in Western Nations too, while “the woke” are demanding their own apartheid: “safe spaces”.
Most people have supported anti-Apartheid movements, but few are prepared to publicly denounce glaringly obvious discriminatory race policies against white people in South Africa in the present day."
https://archive.ph/2021.06.14-205543/http://thesaker.is/apartheid-vs-apartheid-in-the-time-of-wokeness/
"Some people claim that the forerunner of Western 'wokeness' and woke-ideology in general was the global anti-apartheid movement of the 80's and 90's that promoted the forced integration of 10 different cultural and linguistic groups into an artificial multicultural "utopia" (with the unspoken objective being to dilute all those cultures) under the banner of [Saint?] Nelson Mandela's "Rainbow Nation" concept in South Africa featuring "Unity in Diversity" and "Ubuntu" which were the forerunners of Western "diversity" and "inclusiveness" (*** while the New South Africa was also one of the first countries to introduce same-sex marriages ***) [+ extreme affirmative action policies], championed by the woke everywhere in the West [today]."
https://alexanderdugin.substack.com/p/the-western-modernity-is-antichrist/comment/83132907
I do think that the recent Olympic Games in Paris have made it possible to definitively settle the issue of transsexuals in sport... and to define a clear position regarding DSD/Disorders of Sexual Development.
In our consulting activities, my colleagues at Futurous and I have worked a lot on the evolution of sport and competition formats. The recognition of the two genres is consubstantial to the nature of the sport.
The instrumentalization of the latter in a social agenda has led to the discrediting of major sports institutions.
For Russia and its BRICS partners, it is also an opportunity to reaffirm, in joint sports competitions, the true values of sport and competition.
With all due respect, but are you not only scratching the surface of the problem here Mr. Dugin?
You mention "god given genders", but why such a strong focus on just the question of gender?
Is the huge amount of plastic surgery overall, and most other futile attempts to counter nature that are going on not similarly repugnant?
Best regards,
Rafael
Part 2 of 2
As an example… Electricity is a powerful and helpful thing if used correctly. However, misused or abused, electricity can be deadly.
The same is true of sexuality. Misused, sex is also deadly. Abusing God’s gift produces problems such as abortion, poverty, rape, adultery, divorce, and pornography. Sexual sin begins with temptation, as all sin does. When we refuse to acknowledge God’s boundaries, we allow lust to dictate our choices. And lust never leads in the right direction. James 1:13-15 says, “Let no one say when he is tempted, ‘I am being tempted by God’; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.”
Another reason sexual sin is such a big deal is that it destroys the picture of the unbreakable covenant God has with His people. The Bible uses marriage as a metaphor to describe the covenant relationship Jesus has with His “bride,” those whom He has bought with His own blood (Revelation 19:7; 2 Corinthians 11:2). In the Old Testament, God often compared rebellious Israel to a wayward wife, using adultery as a picture of the most heinous of sins (Jeremiah 3:6). God created the sex act to be a consummation of a covenant relationship—a covenant in which God has participated (Malachi 2:14; Matthew 19:6; Mark 10:9). The marriage covenant illustrates God’s unbreakable covenant with us. To engage in sex outside of marriage violates God’s intention and brings serious consequences.
Sexual sin defiles more than just our physical bodies (1 Corinthians 6:18). It has spiritual significance. Almost every book of the Bible renounces sexual immorality, indicating that God considers it a grave sin. Committing sexual sin is directly opposed to God’s will to sanctify us (1 Thessalonians 4:3).
Romans 13:13–14 outlines the life God desires us to live: “Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in carousing and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy. Rather, clothe yourselves with the Lord Jesus Christ, and do not think about how to gratify the desires of the flesh.” Sexual sin is one more way people gratify the flesh rather than walk in the Spirit (Galatians 5:16). Jesus said that the “pure in heart” will “see God” (Matthew 5:8). Unrepentant sexual sin defiles the heart, making it impossible to experience the power of the Holy Spirit in our lives. If we wish to be pure in heart, we cannot engage in sexual sin.
My Faith and belief underscores that our creator, God, perfectly encapsulated and prescribed the basis by which we need live our lives, what we need adhere unto in order our lives be fulfilling, homosexuality, Trans, Queer, Pedophilia, Beastiality, is not condoned under any metric, by any measure, all considered perversions, just as physical abuse of our children and wives/partners is considered to me…
Those directives, clearly enunciated unequivocally stating gods law, is more than sufficient for me, good enough for the Lord to warn us against such, good enough, logical enough for us to not err by bending to our will his dik tat… period… just saying.
Kia Kaha from New Zealand
Ref and acknowledgment to GotQuestions.org… Copied for a easy to understand explanatory…
Part 1 of 2
I fully concur and agree, God has designed and created as we well know and understand on the sixth and very last day of creation the two sexes, man…Adam, first then for companionship throughout life and to enable procreation…
Ref:The First Book of Moses Called Genesis…
The Book of Genesis Chapter 1:23-31
23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Further in the Book of Enoch Chapter 69 … whilst Enoch is being shown the secrets of the machinations of the heavens… we know that it was disclosed unto Enoch that as the sons of man and until we had sinned in Eden, Gadreel, being one of the 6 chiefs Jeqon, Asbeel, Gadreel, Penemue, Kasadja and Kassel, they all having been prior to their sentence proclaimed upon by them by God, for having tempted and led astray the two hundred Fallen Angels, the Watchers whose mission was upon the earth, that these six anointed and chosen by god to minister over the Angels of Heaven, whose calling was amongst those anointed Holy Angels being chief over hundreds, over fifties, over tens of Angels, that they these six, who amongst them Gadreel, had been he both had showed unto “the children of men, all the blows of death, and he led astray Eve, and showed the weapons of Death to the sons of men, the shield and the coat of mail and the sword for battle and all the weapons of death to the children of men. And from his hand they have proceeded against those who dwell on the earth from that day and for evermore…
Whilst it is written it was Penemue (he of the six it was who…
“taught the children of men the bitter and the sweet, and he taught them all the secrets of their (The Six) wisdom, And he instructed mankind in writing with ink, and paper and thereby many sinned from eternity to eternity, and until this day. For men were created exactly like the Angels, to the intent that they should continue pure and righteous and death which destroys everything could not have taken hold of them, but through this their knowledge they are perishing and through this power it is consuming me… “
Thus as written in both the Bible and the Book of Enoch, we understand and gain insight into Gods intent for man, the children of men, the son of man, woman were created for specific purpose, God giving man, Adam dominion over all living things, the intent by which we had been created clearly defined, further scripture clearly enunciates gods disdain for homosexuality, for the queer… God’s disdain as equal for men dressing in Woman’s clothing… or as like unto a woman, further still regarding pedophilia God advises unequivocally the seriousness of the sin together the punishment to be meted out unto those harming even the single hair of a child…such sin as we know is referenced frequently in Scripture…
What makes sexual sin such a big deal?
Sadly, modern culture has tried to redefine sexuality as a personal right to be exercised any way an individual wishes. Sexual behavior is considered a personal choice, akin to the decision of whether to buy a house or rent a condo. At the same time, popular opinion has all but removed the word sin from our culture’s vocabulary. The only sexual expression considered “wrong” is what is deemed distasteful to the definer. However, social acceptability varies so greatly that even the vilest of acts would be considered justified by many. So, before we can determine why sexual sin is such a big deal, we have to define sexual sin.
Fortunately, man has never been given the privilege of defining sin. The One who created sexuality also has the right to set the boundaries for it, and the Bible is clear about the guidelines. When God created the first man, Adam, and brought to him the first woman, Eve, He joined them together in marriage and pronounced it “very good” (Genesis 1:31; 2:18, 24). At that time, God introduced sexuality and set the boundaries for its expression. God created a union between a husband and wife that He called “becoming one flesh” (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:6; Mark 10:8; Ephesians 5:31). He then defined any sexual activity outside of the husband-wife relationship as a violation of His gift. Fornication, homosexuality, pornography, and lust are all violations of God’s intent when He created the sexual act (1 Corinthians 6:9,18; Galatians 5:19-20; Jude 1:7; Matthew 5:28; Hebrews 13:4).
So why is the violation of those boundaries such a big deal? The first clue lies in Genesis 2:24 with the words “one flesh.” There is great unifying power within the sexual union. God designed it to involve not only bodies but hearts and lives. Sex was designed to consummate the lifetime union between a man and woman. Jesus said, “What God has joined together let no one separate” (Matthew 19:6; Mark 10:9). He designed male and female bodies differently so that they could come together in an act of physical intimacy that joins them together for life. They “are no longer two, but one flesh” (Mark 10:8). The act of becoming one creates a new entity: a family. This powerful force also brings forth new life (Genesis 4:25). The human race can only be propagated by the coming together of a man and a woman. And, within marriage, God blesses it (Genesis 1:28; 9:27; Psalm 17:3). Sex is a gift to a husband and wife to make their relationship unique among all other relationships.
However, what God creates as good, Satan perverts. Satan began his insidious defilement in the Garden of Eden with the words “Has God said?” (Genesis 3:1). And that challenge to the authority of God continues still. When we use sexuality for entertainment or to satisfy lust, we cheapen the beauty of this powerful gift and defy the One who designed it. We also reap the consequences of our sin. Our sexual disobedience has produced a world staggering under the weight of disease, abortion, perversion, child molestation, addiction, and sexual exploitation. God created boundaries for our good so that we could enjoy His gift as it was designed to be enjoyed.
Part 2 of 2 Follows…
I’m not Christian nor follower of any religion or religious beliefs. I believe though, that nature created two sides that complement each other to keep creating life. If a man or a woman feels they’re something else other than their nature assigned gender that’s their personal issue, governments or “modern”societies shouldn’t force this mentality into schools or into other countries culture.
Exactly! The term 'norm' has been co-opted by the far left, and labelling ordinary people as 'far right' is a tactic used to legitimise this ideology.
Quegli estremisti della sinistra radicalscic hanno portato il materialismo e il nichelismo all'ennesima potenza, distruggendo tutti i valori della Tradizione. Loro sono i responsabili della non-cultura, del degrado assoluto della civiltà occidentale.
So true