Alexander Dugin sees a rising chance for the Islamic world to form a sovereign pole — if it unites now against Western hegemony and stands with multipolarity.
The Neovons are trying to divide and conquer MAGA! This is the same as WMDs in Iraq! another forever war in the Mideast where they will steal more from the American people! We have had enough !!! That's why we elected Trump! They are trying to turn him against his base! How can America support a genocidal regime in Israel ! Trump needs to turn away from the Neocons! Unfortunately, right now he needs them to pass his big beautiful BILL ! True MAGA wants self determination and peace for the Palestinians and for the Iranians. We want peace with Russia. True MAGA stands with Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon and Tulsi Gabbard. God bless.
I believe there is a basic misunderstanding here. India is not opposed to the Islamic countries or the emergence of a Islamic pole. It has had a very good and pragmatic approach to Iran, and has furthermore developed the Chabahar port as a vital new link between Mumbai and Astrakhan-Moscow & Central Asia. It has excellent relations with the Gulf states, Qatar included. Its internal issues with a large fifth column (which incidentally includes the famous 'secular' Hindus) inside the country are kept largely separate from its foreign policy and respect for other nations, except in obvious cases where national security is at stake, as in the case of Pakistan & Bangladesh. India has close economic relations with the Emiratis and Saudis, and last but not least, Iran.
The India of the BJP is an ethnosupremacist state, much like Israel is. It is hellbent on marginalizing all minorities whether it be Indian Muslims, Indian Christians, or Indian others. Infact non-aligned Hindus are also victims of BJP suppression. This is not known to most of the world today, but its only a matter of time...as we have seen with Israel.
'Ethnosupremacist'? You rightly point out an important similarity between India and Israel. It is however based on civilisation & religion, not ethnos. The BJP broke the colonial mould of Congress et al., likely forever, especially considering that Congress is seemingly unable to reinvent itself away from a dynastic party centred on the Gandhis. They will probably never allow the likes of Shashi Tharoor, for instance, to control the party (he is a nationalist, though not one in the BJP mould). India is experiencing a civilisational awakening of its majority population, i.e. Hindus. Congressis & seculars etc are therefore non-aligned with Bharatiya civilisation, not with the BJP per se. The suppression you talk about is one of transgenerational colonially rooted blindness and self-abasement, not of dissenting opinions or viewpoints per se. Also, the BJP is internally fractured, a fact you seem to be ignorant about, incidentally just as the Israeli state is, though the latter is of course much less so than the BJP or India (I guess size matters here!). There are other nationalist and civilisational organisations too, such as RSS, VHP, and Bajrang Dal, not necessarily aligned with the BJP. As the recent confrontation with Pakistan has shown, there are also plenty of Muslim and minorities leaders and organisations 'aligned' with the BJP government if it comes to an international confrontation (the famous Owaisi from Hyderabad - hardly a BJP sympathizer! - comes to mind here). The victims you mention are therefore self-victimized and self-marginalized.
With Erdogan in turkie looks difficult the guy isn't only reliable but is a Zionist agent. He can do lots of folklore againt zionists attacking Iran but in fact is seated waiting for an opportunityto stab iran on it's back and take into turkie the Iranian territory where there are some people with turkish origins and get a land conection into caspian sea and Azerbaijan and finally open caspian sea to united states of Sodom /nato.
So unity among muslims don't look possible as long as such vultures exist on that world. All rest is be naive.
Unfortunately, Islamic World is divided by the British Empire. The grand children of Lawrence of Arabia are in business still. Turkey-Qatar-City of London axis tries to eliminate Iran.
The real war isn’t fought with missiles—but with: 💵 Banks (Rothschild-era financial colonialism) 🎥 Hollywood (manufacturing "evil" villains) 📰 Fake WMD narratives (Iraq 2.0?)
I love Russia, the Russian Nation and its History concerning any branch of human societies’ development. I have a lot of respect for Putin Leadership though, like any human he isn’t perfect , perfection doesn’t exist in the Universe! Current Russian Federation policy concerning the Middle East can’t be justified on the ground that Iran should have been more close to Russia like North Corea has. Islamic Iran is a product of a quite recent revolution and has been able in less than a century to develop its wealth, state of the art technologies concerning the army industry. It has been able to help Russia with arms and drones that nobody can compite with. Iran couldn’t ever accept the offer of Russia to become as close as North Corea for the simple reason that the nature of Islamic Iran isn’t shared all over the Islamic World. Iran was born independent and will stay independent. Isn’t a sound objective reflection of the reality on the ground that if Iran had accepted Putin offer the actual attack by Nazi Zionist Tribes occupying Palestine, would not have happened. Assad’s Syria was destroyed and, handed over to head choppers on the payroll of USA and the Zionists , Russia bear responsibility, Russia still keep a military base in Syria and has “ambiguous” stand with the present Satanic regime. Iran won’t be defeated and is very improbable that will ask Putin to intervene in the current conflict. The Samson option has always been on the table of Netanyahu the butcher , (as the last resort for survival) and it may be activated if the Russian Federation will keep being in two different shoes simultaneously. I wish the Russian People to take back all of Ukraine, it was Russia and will be Russian again, perhaps! To believe, as Mr Dugin does , in Trumpism Et Trump is somehow ridiculous. Trump ha been elected by the Deep deep State to perform the harlequin, he doesn’t hold any power and is blackmailed by the Mossad that holds files concerning Trump’s love for young, attractive prostitutes .
Muslimah here. First and foremost much respect to you sir. Independently from this or that conclusion, you ate a true thinker, something the European West is tragically lacking lately, and I truly am grateful for that.
That said, with due respect, muslims are already united. In faith. The most united practicing monotheistic faith so far, actually, despite the odds, the destriction, the titanic attempts to secularise and bring down beleivers. Faith, imane, is what holds us, not the two seconds we spend on this planet. Literally.
Our problem, and we do have several, isn’t in unity. We have an issue with the so called Western European concept of modernity, a misunderstanding of what life on Earth is about. In that respect we are no different from the rest of the planet, Western Europeans included: we’re in a transformative struggle. Russia knows a bit about that.
We will, this time or the next, by God’s blessing, find the key to the equation. And so will our brothers and sisters in Humanity.
I never agreed with your thesis on the Islam as a pole within multipolarity; nevertheless, I am aware of where is this position coming from: a personal esoteric nexus with esoteric Shiism. However, esoteric shiism isn't embodied by the Ayatollahs; political Shiism has lost its roots.
The Islamic world is not, and never will be, a unified entity, unless it manifests a unipolar will. And this unipolar will is precisely what the Qur’an demands and what the Prophet embodied: the sovereign who, by divine mandate, unified and conquered the world of his time. The sacred text does not merely describe reality and substance; it commands the creation of a world under its dominion. Islam is thus not a civilization content with plurality; it is, in its political-theological core, a project of unipolarity: a katechonic force inverted, seeking not to restrain universalism but to realize it. This imperative has echoed through history: in the Arab-Sunni expansion, in the Turco-Mongol conquests, and today in the enduring struggle against Shiism and Persian particularism, which resists absorption into the Qur’an’s universal horizon.
It was Ibn Battuta’s Rihla that first revealed this dynamic to me. His journey was not mere adventure; it was a cartography of a world without borders, where the friend-enemy distinction was dissolved into submission to the One Law or enmity. Even today, Islam’s political-theological essence is to transcend limits, to erase Schmittian space through the imposition of the sacred text as world-order. The Qur’an stands as the infinite horizon for the Islamic world, just as the Bible does for the WASP world, each tradition literalist, each projecting its sacred word onto world-structure, defining boundaries, enemies, and destinies. Both refuse to accept the world as given (Weltlosigkeit), and in this refusal lies the political engine of universal conquest.
Thus, the idea that Islam could exist peacefully as one pole among many is a liberal fantasy; a dangerous illusion; it is almost a Soros’s and the Open Society ambition. Like the American pole, the Islamic pole will always tend toward unipolarity, for the Book demands it.
Consider India and Pakistan. Both Western and Asian powers have exploited this fracture. Iran, though aligned with Pakistan, has kept silent on India, not from respect for multipolarity, but because neither allows Shiite political penetration. Iran’s doctrine: better the Pakistani nuclear umbrella than Russian protection. Since the revolution, Tehran has decisively closed the door to Moscow, banning pro-Russian socialist forces like Tudeh. This was a Schmittian decision; a sovereign act defining friend and enemy within the revolution’s space. Since then, Iran’s alliances have served its own eschatological vision, not any shared Eurasian project. Russia remains, in the Ayatollahs’ eyes, a pillar of the imperialist West.
And yet, here lies an historic opportunity. Russia today has the chance, perhaps for the first time since the Safavid age, to penetrate Iran and reshape the regime’s structure; its political theology, its friend-enemy matrix, its eschatological drive. If Moscow were to succeed, it could break the Russophobic impulse embedded in the Islamic Republic since 1979, and reorient Tehran toward a genuine multipolarity. But can this happen? I fear Russia lacks the necessary tools, the deep cultural intelligence, the capacity to engage with Shiism’s intricate symbolic universe and transform it from within. Moscow remains too exterior to Iran’s political theology to effect such a penetration.
At the same time, Russia holds another untapped lever of transformation: the Russian Jews of Israel. This is a community large enough, rooted enough, and distinct enough to act as an instrument of reshaping the current Anglo-Zionist. or paradoxically “anti-Zionist”, model of a greater, escathological Israel. A model which, for all its Zionist rhetoric, serves the WASP eschatology more than any authentic Jewish destiny. By empowering this Russian Jewish element, Russia could help forge a new Israel, one that no longer functions as the terminal of Anglo-American eschatology, but as a sovereign force capable of altering the sacred-political architecture of the Middle East. Here, in two non-Arab, non-Turkish states, Iran and Israel, Russia could rewrite the region’s destiny, by reshaping its eschatological axis.
This would be a brilliant role for Russia, a truly imperial task, worthy of a Eurasian sovereign. But I fear that Russia, as it stands, lacks the skills, the will, the subtlety to penetrate Shiism, to overcome the deeply rooted Russophobia of the Iranian regime, or to reconfigure Israel’s internal friend-enemy structures. Without this capacity for inner transformation, Russia risks remaining a spectator while the American and Islamic unipolar projects continue their advance.
Trump understood at least part of this. His recognition of Jerusalem was no mere diplomatic gesture; it was a sovereign decision in the Schmittian sense, sealing the sacred-political status of the city. His supporters, many of them unconscious of their own political theology, act out the friend-enemy distinction through their alignment with Israel. Without evangelicalism, there is no Trump; without Israel, no evangelicalism. And this friend-enemy architecture defines deep America.
Now the grotesque spectacle unfolds in the West: woke-LGBT activists marching under Palestinian flags, even parading images of the Ayatollah, the supposed tyrant of tradition, now transformed into the icon of progressive rebellion. The friend-enemy structure of liberalism has collapsed into farce, where all enemies of the WASP order are embraced, no matter how contradictory. Iran, Soros, China, Maduro, the Cartels, Qatar, Pakistan; vectors that converge, sometimes incoherently, in their shared enmity toward deep America. Trump knows this. Those who claim America has no reason to strike Iran ignore Tehran’s role in the opioid war, the cartel nexus, the moral disintegration of the U.S. alongside China (and, yes...Russia).
The Tulsi Gabbard affair, her alignment with Iranian and Assadist visions, illustrates how deep this penetration has gone. To place such a figure at the heart of national security would be to surrender the friend-enemy distinction itself; sovereignty in Schmitt’s deepest sense.
And so, we stand at the threshold. The Islamic Revolution, at its core, was Jacobin, accelerationist, anti-Islamic in the authentic sense: a fusion of Shiite orthodoxy and the modern state without precedent in Persian history. Like the Wahhabis, like Israel and Saudi Arabia, the Ayatollahs play the imperial game: rule through sectarian minorities, restructure the oil economy for external gain. There is no genuine anti-imperialism here. Only a new imperial matrix, unipolar, eschatological; the true enemy of any multipolar order worthy of the name.
The problem with your argument is that you fail to see the rotten side of today's Russia - - the money system, which imposed Covid and anti-Covid BS on Russians (not on the Swedes or the Tanzanians) and cost Russia some USD 300,000 million in international reserves upon entering the Donbass in February 2022 to stop the carnage there. Glazyev (now in Belarus?) then denounced the Central Bank of Russia (controlled by the Rothschild's according to the assassinated Stephen Mitford Goodson, see his books written from his seat at the board of directors of South Africa 's Central Bank) and pointed at their criminal liability, though he never used those words to refer to the credit scam (see the Bank of England's 'Money creation in the modern economy', 2014), which is the link connecting the diplomacy of Russia to that of the US, behind the media show. RT is Rothschild-controlled--check his critic Max Kaiser and try mad find in his many many words any clear statement on credit, the money creation mechanism that is the financial heart of both zionism and globalism. Iran still forbids usury, and that one is also a likely reason for the strife. Many a major development since 2014 is driven by the attempt by the usurers to preserve and impose (under the guise of BIS-directed CBDCs) their money-creation mechanism on the rest of the world, for which they need world power or government. Remember Xi 's China is the greatest public credit (I. E. Public money) system around, and it works. I miss your attention to this relevant point, Mr Dugin. Eduardo Guzmán, under electromagnetic harassment by MOSSAD agents since I started talking about these issues over five years ago.
I recall screaming in frustration when, after Raisi was assassinated, the Iranian voters chose this gullible idiotic well-meaning fool Pezeshkian instead - actually screaming! - and now the consequences have come home to roost.
Quite revealing the West/Zionazis are not threatening to assassinate HIM, isn't it?
I don't see any signs that the Islamic world will unite behind Iran. First of all, Trump isn't Bush. He shows no signs of wanting to invade Iran. He started clearly that his goal is to end Iran's nuclear weapons program. People falsely compare Iran to Iraq, yet no one denies that Iran is enriching uranium past 60% when no peaceful use exists requiring more than 4%. The reality is that the other Islamic states don't want Iran to have a nuke either, because they know Iran will use it to threaten them, too and gain the upper hand in pushing it's own form of radical Islam and will embolden Iran to make more use of terror groups like Hezbollah if other Islamic states don't bend to Iran's will. The other Islamic states see a better future in making trade deals with the US under Trump.
1. Iran DOESN'T HAVE a nuclear weapons program. What Trump is doing is giving them a very good reason to start one.
2. The purpose of the enrichment was to create pressure for the West to live up to the agreements they had signed - likely a foolish move tbh, especially in hindsight, but that was the intended purpose.
3. Shia Islam is not 'radical', although like Islam generally it is militant. Minorities in Iran have it pretty good, compared to all the Sunni states (And compared to most Western countries too, for that matter).
4. Hezbollah is not a "Terror group", it is a national liberation movement, similar to the ANC but with even less violence used. It's function is almost entirely defensive. The REAL terror movement in the region is Israhell and the Western powers; who also support and provision the Al Qa'ida and ISIS groups.
5. The "Other Islamic states" are vassals and satraps of the West, and do not represent their own people whatsoever, among whom the admiration of Iran and Hezbollah and AnsarAllah are growing to historical highs.
Did you ever learn to shoot guns? You learn never to pull a gun on someone unless you're willing to shoot them. So Iran is enriching uranium to threaten Israel and America (even before they even have nukes). So what happens if they ignore it? What are they then going to do with that uranium to up the threat? Taqqiya (deception) is baked into their religion. Enriching uranium is the difficult and lengthy process of building a weapon. Do you really think the US and Israel should wait until Iran has a nuclear weapon to take action to stop it when Iran's openly stated policy is the destruction of the US and Israel?
Didn't you know you're not supposed to BELIEVE your own BS in such a role?
Perhaps you don't know, but when the JCPOA was signed, Iran handed over all it's highly enriched material to Russia to be disposed of, overseen by the IEAE.
It hoped for the same process again. Bear in mind it ONLY did this once the US broke its side of the agreement first.
Perhaps you think the USA should not be bound by legal agreements it has signed?
Because you don't seem to care about that.
Actually 'enriching uranium' once you have the centrifuges is no big deal, it's all the other essential factors - building the warhead; the triggers; fitting it onto a missile; testing; as Tulsi said, even with 90%+ uranium at the ready, the rest will take 1-3 years, depending on how much help they get. That's the CIA assessment, btw.
As for "Iran's openly stated policy is the destruction of the US and Israel?", just lay down the CNN/Faux crack pipes and back away slowly.
For a start, half of Israhell's population is PALESTINIAN. Any use of WMDs will inevitably kill huge numbers of those they are trying to save from genocide. And Iran has NEVER said they will attack the USA unilaterally, EVER. It is the US that is constantly saying they will regime change/attack/nuke Iran, not the other way around. Pull your head out of your arse.
That's a theory. In support of it, one long term plan by the WASPS is to eradicate all of Global Jewry, for sure.
On the other hand, in the short term, that is unlikely to be an aim specifically of Trump (Y'know, what with his favourite daughters marriage into it, fx).
I don't think it's a goal of Trump, but it might happen anyway, due to the underlying crosscurrents that he cannot help but swim in.
The Neovons are trying to divide and conquer MAGA! This is the same as WMDs in Iraq! another forever war in the Mideast where they will steal more from the American people! We have had enough !!! That's why we elected Trump! They are trying to turn him against his base! How can America support a genocidal regime in Israel ! Trump needs to turn away from the Neocons! Unfortunately, right now he needs them to pass his big beautiful BILL ! True MAGA wants self determination and peace for the Palestinians and for the Iranians. We want peace with Russia. True MAGA stands with Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon and Tulsi Gabbard. God bless.
Trump obliterated MAGA last week.
He owns MAGAsaki
I believe there is a basic misunderstanding here. India is not opposed to the Islamic countries or the emergence of a Islamic pole. It has had a very good and pragmatic approach to Iran, and has furthermore developed the Chabahar port as a vital new link between Mumbai and Astrakhan-Moscow & Central Asia. It has excellent relations with the Gulf states, Qatar included. Its internal issues with a large fifth column (which incidentally includes the famous 'secular' Hindus) inside the country are kept largely separate from its foreign policy and respect for other nations, except in obvious cases where national security is at stake, as in the case of Pakistan & Bangladesh. India has close economic relations with the Emiratis and Saudis, and last but not least, Iran.
The India of the BJP is an ethnosupremacist state, much like Israel is. It is hellbent on marginalizing all minorities whether it be Indian Muslims, Indian Christians, or Indian others. Infact non-aligned Hindus are also victims of BJP suppression. This is not known to most of the world today, but its only a matter of time...as we have seen with Israel.
'Ethnosupremacist'? You rightly point out an important similarity between India and Israel. It is however based on civilisation & religion, not ethnos. The BJP broke the colonial mould of Congress et al., likely forever, especially considering that Congress is seemingly unable to reinvent itself away from a dynastic party centred on the Gandhis. They will probably never allow the likes of Shashi Tharoor, for instance, to control the party (he is a nationalist, though not one in the BJP mould). India is experiencing a civilisational awakening of its majority population, i.e. Hindus. Congressis & seculars etc are therefore non-aligned with Bharatiya civilisation, not with the BJP per se. The suppression you talk about is one of transgenerational colonially rooted blindness and self-abasement, not of dissenting opinions or viewpoints per se. Also, the BJP is internally fractured, a fact you seem to be ignorant about, incidentally just as the Israeli state is, though the latter is of course much less so than the BJP or India (I guess size matters here!). There are other nationalist and civilisational organisations too, such as RSS, VHP, and Bajrang Dal, not necessarily aligned with the BJP. As the recent confrontation with Pakistan has shown, there are also plenty of Muslim and minorities leaders and organisations 'aligned' with the BJP government if it comes to an international confrontation (the famous Owaisi from Hyderabad - hardly a BJP sympathizer! - comes to mind here). The victims you mention are therefore self-victimized and self-marginalized.
Never stop writing. Never.
With Erdogan in turkie looks difficult the guy isn't only reliable but is a Zionist agent. He can do lots of folklore againt zionists attacking Iran but in fact is seated waiting for an opportunityto stab iran on it's back and take into turkie the Iranian territory where there are some people with turkish origins and get a land conection into caspian sea and Azerbaijan and finally open caspian sea to united states of Sodom /nato.
So unity among muslims don't look possible as long as such vultures exist on that world. All rest is be naive.
Erdo's son-in-law is surrounded by Zionazi agents.
Is a big family.
Unfortunately, Islamic World is divided by the British Empire. The grand children of Lawrence of Arabia are in business still. Turkey-Qatar-City of London axis tries to eliminate Iran.
The Anglo-Saxons are constantly dividing Muslims and thus hunting in the dark. Only they benefit from this and everyone else is harmed.
The real war isn’t fought with missiles—but with: 💵 Banks (Rothschild-era financial colonialism) 🎥 Hollywood (manufacturing "evil" villains) 📰 Fake WMD narratives (Iraq 2.0?)
I love Russia, the Russian Nation and its History concerning any branch of human societies’ development. I have a lot of respect for Putin Leadership though, like any human he isn’t perfect , perfection doesn’t exist in the Universe! Current Russian Federation policy concerning the Middle East can’t be justified on the ground that Iran should have been more close to Russia like North Corea has. Islamic Iran is a product of a quite recent revolution and has been able in less than a century to develop its wealth, state of the art technologies concerning the army industry. It has been able to help Russia with arms and drones that nobody can compite with. Iran couldn’t ever accept the offer of Russia to become as close as North Corea for the simple reason that the nature of Islamic Iran isn’t shared all over the Islamic World. Iran was born independent and will stay independent. Isn’t a sound objective reflection of the reality on the ground that if Iran had accepted Putin offer the actual attack by Nazi Zionist Tribes occupying Palestine, would not have happened. Assad’s Syria was destroyed and, handed over to head choppers on the payroll of USA and the Zionists , Russia bear responsibility, Russia still keep a military base in Syria and has “ambiguous” stand with the present Satanic regime. Iran won’t be defeated and is very improbable that will ask Putin to intervene in the current conflict. The Samson option has always been on the table of Netanyahu the butcher , (as the last resort for survival) and it may be activated if the Russian Federation will keep being in two different shoes simultaneously. I wish the Russian People to take back all of Ukraine, it was Russia and will be Russian again, perhaps! To believe, as Mr Dugin does , in Trumpism Et Trump is somehow ridiculous. Trump ha been elected by the Deep deep State to perform the harlequin, he doesn’t hold any power and is blackmailed by the Mossad that holds files concerning Trump’s love for young, attractive prostitutes .
This is so true. A clown who buys time and has trampled almost all pre-election promises
After the occupation of Israel is completed, an Islamic world that is co-ordinated by the good counsel of the Persians will be a glorious thing.
That would be great. I hope that will happen
Muslimah here. First and foremost much respect to you sir. Independently from this or that conclusion, you ate a true thinker, something the European West is tragically lacking lately, and I truly am grateful for that.
That said, with due respect, muslims are already united. In faith. The most united practicing monotheistic faith so far, actually, despite the odds, the destriction, the titanic attempts to secularise and bring down beleivers. Faith, imane, is what holds us, not the two seconds we spend on this planet. Literally.
Our problem, and we do have several, isn’t in unity. We have an issue with the so called Western European concept of modernity, a misunderstanding of what life on Earth is about. In that respect we are no different from the rest of the planet, Western Europeans included: we’re in a transformative struggle. Russia knows a bit about that.
We will, this time or the next, by God’s blessing, find the key to the equation. And so will our brothers and sisters in Humanity.
Insha’Allah.
Dear Dr. Dugin,
I never agreed with your thesis on the Islam as a pole within multipolarity; nevertheless, I am aware of where is this position coming from: a personal esoteric nexus with esoteric Shiism. However, esoteric shiism isn't embodied by the Ayatollahs; political Shiism has lost its roots.
The Islamic world is not, and never will be, a unified entity, unless it manifests a unipolar will. And this unipolar will is precisely what the Qur’an demands and what the Prophet embodied: the sovereign who, by divine mandate, unified and conquered the world of his time. The sacred text does not merely describe reality and substance; it commands the creation of a world under its dominion. Islam is thus not a civilization content with plurality; it is, in its political-theological core, a project of unipolarity: a katechonic force inverted, seeking not to restrain universalism but to realize it. This imperative has echoed through history: in the Arab-Sunni expansion, in the Turco-Mongol conquests, and today in the enduring struggle against Shiism and Persian particularism, which resists absorption into the Qur’an’s universal horizon.
It was Ibn Battuta’s Rihla that first revealed this dynamic to me. His journey was not mere adventure; it was a cartography of a world without borders, where the friend-enemy distinction was dissolved into submission to the One Law or enmity. Even today, Islam’s political-theological essence is to transcend limits, to erase Schmittian space through the imposition of the sacred text as world-order. The Qur’an stands as the infinite horizon for the Islamic world, just as the Bible does for the WASP world, each tradition literalist, each projecting its sacred word onto world-structure, defining boundaries, enemies, and destinies. Both refuse to accept the world as given (Weltlosigkeit), and in this refusal lies the political engine of universal conquest.
Thus, the idea that Islam could exist peacefully as one pole among many is a liberal fantasy; a dangerous illusion; it is almost a Soros’s and the Open Society ambition. Like the American pole, the Islamic pole will always tend toward unipolarity, for the Book demands it.
Consider India and Pakistan. Both Western and Asian powers have exploited this fracture. Iran, though aligned with Pakistan, has kept silent on India, not from respect for multipolarity, but because neither allows Shiite political penetration. Iran’s doctrine: better the Pakistani nuclear umbrella than Russian protection. Since the revolution, Tehran has decisively closed the door to Moscow, banning pro-Russian socialist forces like Tudeh. This was a Schmittian decision; a sovereign act defining friend and enemy within the revolution’s space. Since then, Iran’s alliances have served its own eschatological vision, not any shared Eurasian project. Russia remains, in the Ayatollahs’ eyes, a pillar of the imperialist West.
And yet, here lies an historic opportunity. Russia today has the chance, perhaps for the first time since the Safavid age, to penetrate Iran and reshape the regime’s structure; its political theology, its friend-enemy matrix, its eschatological drive. If Moscow were to succeed, it could break the Russophobic impulse embedded in the Islamic Republic since 1979, and reorient Tehran toward a genuine multipolarity. But can this happen? I fear Russia lacks the necessary tools, the deep cultural intelligence, the capacity to engage with Shiism’s intricate symbolic universe and transform it from within. Moscow remains too exterior to Iran’s political theology to effect such a penetration.
At the same time, Russia holds another untapped lever of transformation: the Russian Jews of Israel. This is a community large enough, rooted enough, and distinct enough to act as an instrument of reshaping the current Anglo-Zionist. or paradoxically “anti-Zionist”, model of a greater, escathological Israel. A model which, for all its Zionist rhetoric, serves the WASP eschatology more than any authentic Jewish destiny. By empowering this Russian Jewish element, Russia could help forge a new Israel, one that no longer functions as the terminal of Anglo-American eschatology, but as a sovereign force capable of altering the sacred-political architecture of the Middle East. Here, in two non-Arab, non-Turkish states, Iran and Israel, Russia could rewrite the region’s destiny, by reshaping its eschatological axis.
This would be a brilliant role for Russia, a truly imperial task, worthy of a Eurasian sovereign. But I fear that Russia, as it stands, lacks the skills, the will, the subtlety to penetrate Shiism, to overcome the deeply rooted Russophobia of the Iranian regime, or to reconfigure Israel’s internal friend-enemy structures. Without this capacity for inner transformation, Russia risks remaining a spectator while the American and Islamic unipolar projects continue their advance.
Trump understood at least part of this. His recognition of Jerusalem was no mere diplomatic gesture; it was a sovereign decision in the Schmittian sense, sealing the sacred-political status of the city. His supporters, many of them unconscious of their own political theology, act out the friend-enemy distinction through their alignment with Israel. Without evangelicalism, there is no Trump; without Israel, no evangelicalism. And this friend-enemy architecture defines deep America.
Now the grotesque spectacle unfolds in the West: woke-LGBT activists marching under Palestinian flags, even parading images of the Ayatollah, the supposed tyrant of tradition, now transformed into the icon of progressive rebellion. The friend-enemy structure of liberalism has collapsed into farce, where all enemies of the WASP order are embraced, no matter how contradictory. Iran, Soros, China, Maduro, the Cartels, Qatar, Pakistan; vectors that converge, sometimes incoherently, in their shared enmity toward deep America. Trump knows this. Those who claim America has no reason to strike Iran ignore Tehran’s role in the opioid war, the cartel nexus, the moral disintegration of the U.S. alongside China (and, yes...Russia).
The Tulsi Gabbard affair, her alignment with Iranian and Assadist visions, illustrates how deep this penetration has gone. To place such a figure at the heart of national security would be to surrender the friend-enemy distinction itself; sovereignty in Schmitt’s deepest sense.
And so, we stand at the threshold. The Islamic Revolution, at its core, was Jacobin, accelerationist, anti-Islamic in the authentic sense: a fusion of Shiite orthodoxy and the modern state without precedent in Persian history. Like the Wahhabis, like Israel and Saudi Arabia, the Ayatollahs play the imperial game: rule through sectarian minorities, restructure the oil economy for external gain. There is no genuine anti-imperialism here. Only a new imperial matrix, unipolar, eschatological; the true enemy of any multipolar order worthy of the name.
Best Wishes
The problem with your argument is that you fail to see the rotten side of today's Russia - - the money system, which imposed Covid and anti-Covid BS on Russians (not on the Swedes or the Tanzanians) and cost Russia some USD 300,000 million in international reserves upon entering the Donbass in February 2022 to stop the carnage there. Glazyev (now in Belarus?) then denounced the Central Bank of Russia (controlled by the Rothschild's according to the assassinated Stephen Mitford Goodson, see his books written from his seat at the board of directors of South Africa 's Central Bank) and pointed at their criminal liability, though he never used those words to refer to the credit scam (see the Bank of England's 'Money creation in the modern economy', 2014), which is the link connecting the diplomacy of Russia to that of the US, behind the media show. RT is Rothschild-controlled--check his critic Max Kaiser and try mad find in his many many words any clear statement on credit, the money creation mechanism that is the financial heart of both zionism and globalism. Iran still forbids usury, and that one is also a likely reason for the strife. Many a major development since 2014 is driven by the attempt by the usurers to preserve and impose (under the guise of BIS-directed CBDCs) their money-creation mechanism on the rest of the world, for which they need world power or government. Remember Xi 's China is the greatest public credit (I. E. Public money) system around, and it works. I miss your attention to this relevant point, Mr Dugin. Eduardo Guzmán, under electromagnetic harassment by MOSSAD agents since I started talking about these issues over five years ago.
Agreed. Superb analysis.
I recall screaming in frustration when, after Raisi was assassinated, the Iranian voters chose this gullible idiotic well-meaning fool Pezeshkian instead - actually screaming! - and now the consequences have come home to roost.
Quite revealing the West/Zionazis are not threatening to assassinate HIM, isn't it?
I don't see any signs that the Islamic world will unite behind Iran. First of all, Trump isn't Bush. He shows no signs of wanting to invade Iran. He started clearly that his goal is to end Iran's nuclear weapons program. People falsely compare Iran to Iraq, yet no one denies that Iran is enriching uranium past 60% when no peaceful use exists requiring more than 4%. The reality is that the other Islamic states don't want Iran to have a nuke either, because they know Iran will use it to threaten them, too and gain the upper hand in pushing it's own form of radical Islam and will embolden Iran to make more use of terror groups like Hezbollah if other Islamic states don't bend to Iran's will. The other Islamic states see a better future in making trade deals with the US under Trump.
1. Iran DOESN'T HAVE a nuclear weapons program. What Trump is doing is giving them a very good reason to start one.
2. The purpose of the enrichment was to create pressure for the West to live up to the agreements they had signed - likely a foolish move tbh, especially in hindsight, but that was the intended purpose.
3. Shia Islam is not 'radical', although like Islam generally it is militant. Minorities in Iran have it pretty good, compared to all the Sunni states (And compared to most Western countries too, for that matter).
4. Hezbollah is not a "Terror group", it is a national liberation movement, similar to the ANC but with even less violence used. It's function is almost entirely defensive. The REAL terror movement in the region is Israhell and the Western powers; who also support and provision the Al Qa'ida and ISIS groups.
5. The "Other Islamic states" are vassals and satraps of the West, and do not represent their own people whatsoever, among whom the admiration of Iran and Hezbollah and AnsarAllah are growing to historical highs.
Bravo!!!!!!!!
Solid.
Thanks David.
Did you ever learn to shoot guns? You learn never to pull a gun on someone unless you're willing to shoot them. So Iran is enriching uranium to threaten Israel and America (even before they even have nukes). So what happens if they ignore it? What are they then going to do with that uranium to up the threat? Taqqiya (deception) is baked into their religion. Enriching uranium is the difficult and lengthy process of building a weapon. Do you really think the US and Israel should wait until Iran has a nuclear weapon to take action to stop it when Iran's openly stated policy is the destruction of the US and Israel?
"Minister if Propaganda" indeed!
Didn't you know you're not supposed to BELIEVE your own BS in such a role?
Perhaps you don't know, but when the JCPOA was signed, Iran handed over all it's highly enriched material to Russia to be disposed of, overseen by the IEAE.
It hoped for the same process again. Bear in mind it ONLY did this once the US broke its side of the agreement first.
Perhaps you think the USA should not be bound by legal agreements it has signed?
Because you don't seem to care about that.
Actually 'enriching uranium' once you have the centrifuges is no big deal, it's all the other essential factors - building the warhead; the triggers; fitting it onto a missile; testing; as Tulsi said, even with 90%+ uranium at the ready, the rest will take 1-3 years, depending on how much help they get. That's the CIA assessment, btw.
As for "Iran's openly stated policy is the destruction of the US and Israel?", just lay down the CNN/Faux crack pipes and back away slowly.
For a start, half of Israhell's population is PALESTINIAN. Any use of WMDs will inevitably kill huge numbers of those they are trying to save from genocide. And Iran has NEVER said they will attack the USA unilaterally, EVER. It is the US that is constantly saying they will regime change/attack/nuke Iran, not the other way around. Pull your head out of your arse.
IAEA found uranium enriched to >80% though.
Did you get a personalised memo from Grossy about it?
I've been shooting since childhood. Obama sent Iran 1.7 billion dollars. I don't believe that Trump will take military action.
That didn't hold up well. ;)
FWIW, Obomber only sent a fraction of what the USA *OWED* Iran, he stiffed them from the first moment that deal was signed.
And then Trump broke the treaty - SIGNED treaty by the US - completely.
I don't know enough about that!
Trump is trying to eliminate Israel!
That's a theory. In support of it, one long term plan by the WASPS is to eradicate all of Global Jewry, for sure.
On the other hand, in the short term, that is unlikely to be an aim specifically of Trump (Y'know, what with his favourite daughters marriage into it, fx).
I don't think it's a goal of Trump, but it might happen anyway, due to the underlying crosscurrents that he cannot help but swim in.
The daughter who married a jew. Isn't married to him anymore. He was a traitor and was exchanged for a double.
AS ALL americans trump is an idiot.
"AS ALL americans trump is an idiot."
AS many Americans, Trump is an idiot.
FIFY
Russia has been under the influence from foreign entities since 1918.
The descendants of the original international goblins are running the show.
Regardless of who's in power.
Trump's
MAGAsaki
It appears that the United States attacked Iran.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8qfb94vWsU