Trump is still the chance for humanity to avoid final catastrophe imposed on us by globalists. It is better to support him, trying to correct and improve his mistakes rather than abandon him at all.
This is what I think as well, though it will take a miracle for Trump to do what he needs to. Perhaps he will have the insight and courage, but I’m not too hopeful. Meanwhile domestic politics are the usual quagmire with the “liberals” or “leftists” without a clue as to what it all means. Between Israel and the US we have two governments run by madmen with completely deluded and confused citizens hopelessly making largely irrelevant noise or going along with mindless gusto. We can only hope the rational leaders of major powers can maintain their sanity and pull through - there are none in Europe other than Orban, they are all madmen too. God help us, but as horrible as it is, man has free will and the power to destroy what has taken so long to build.
Agree. Look how intelligent calm and strategic thinking Putin and Xi Jinping are. You never see them lose control and threaten others Trump scream and threats every one Trump is like a child and it’s very easy for other leaders to read him and manipulate him Because Trump self believes his a genius he don’t realize how other people play him. The call him TACO president because he constantly change his mind He don’t have a vision or a clear strategy Only MAGA words He talks most about what he wants but not how he will realize it. His legacy will probably be worse than Biden’s Especially if he starts WW 3. All his talk about being a president of peace is pure bull shit. Like other presidents are also Trump controlled by the Zionist mafia and Israel’s puppet and work to keep the Military Industrial Complex MIC running for full speed 24/7.
This text is a highly charged political commentary that blends conspiratorial rhetoric, metaphysical symbolism, and geopolitical judgment. At the level of structure, it is marked by repetition and fragmentation. The phrase “President Trump in spite of all is still the most hated and most attacked person in the world” is repeated almost verbatim, suggesting either a lack of editorial discipline or a deliberate rhetorical echo meant to reinforce an image of martyrdom. Syntax is often loose, grammatically inconsistent, with abrupt transitions and unclear referents—such as “the split of MAGA of not Trump’s wars he still supports”—which adds to the chaotic and unstable tone. Tautology and incoherence appear frequently, with the argument looping on itself rather than developing. Phrases like “not his war” and “not his Epstein list” are rhetorically intriguing but ultimately vague and contradictory. There is a simultaneous attempt to absolve Trump of responsibility for these conflicts while also acknowledging his support for them—a narrative of passive entrapment rather than active agency.
The underlying argument attempts to paint Trump as a misunderstood or manipulated figure, continuing wars that he allegedly does not own. This formulation, however, becomes strained. If he is truly opposed to the wars, why is he supporting them? If they are truly “not his,” what would justify his continued involvement? This internal contradiction allows the speaker to construct a narrative that both excuses Trump and places blame upon him, creating a martyr without agency. At the heart of this rhetorical construction are the figures of the “globalists” and “neocons,” invoked as shadowy antagonists without specific definition. “Globalists” functions here as a floating signifier, often used in far-right discourse as a euphemism for transnational elites, sometimes with antisemitic undertones. “Neocons,” while having a historical grounding in U.S. foreign policy, are collapsed into the same category as the metaphysical enemy—thus losing their particularity and becoming a general symbol of evil.
Metaphysical language appears throughout the text, heightening its mythic tone. The claim that Trump is hesitating “between two metaphysical poles” casts him in a Manichaean drama of cosmic dualism. But this metaphysical framing is philosophically hollow, serving more as ornament than substance. Indecision is rendered into a moral achievement, as if wavering between war and peace is itself virtuous because it signifies some grand internal struggle. This is not only a weak ethical position; it also obfuscates the need for concrete political accountability.
The rhetoric functions through mythologizing and messianism. Trump is described as a tragic king, surrounded by enemies. The Shakespearean echo in “the king in trouble” infuses the text with pathos and fatalism. Such language mythologizes Trump not as a political actor but as a messianic figure enduring trial on behalf of the people. Simultaneously, the claim that he is “the most hated and most attacked person in the world” reinforces his role as a victim and redeemer. This narrative of persecution encourages loyalty by identifying Trump’s suffering with that of the reader or nation. Binarism dominates the logic of the text: Trump versus globalists, good versus evil, Jerusalem versus al-Aqsa. This black-and-white thinking eliminates nuance, replacing geopolitical complexity with cosmic struggle. There is no space for diplomacy, mutual recognition, or complexity—only sides to be taken in a final metaphysical battle.
In the geopolitical dimension, particularly concerning the Middle East, the analysis collapses into crude reductionism. Statements such as “Zionist Israel is absolute enemy of Iran, Shia, Arab and Muslim world” erase the diversity of political opinion and historical nuance in the region. Framing these conflicts as a “duel” between oppositional eschatologies ignores the material, historical, and socio-political conditions driving them. This rhetorical gesture turns real human suffering and conflict into a theological sport. The suggestion to “let them compete in that” implies disengagement and abdication of responsibility. But this contradicts earlier warnings about looming catastrophe, revealing a confused oscillation between isolationism and doomsday interventionism. The claim that the conflict “has nothing to do with Christianity” is both inaccurate and rhetorical. It tries to separate Christian eschatology from political involvement, but this fails to account for the significant role that apocalyptic Christian Zionism plays in U.S. support for Israel, particularly among Trump’s evangelical base. This selective distancing is a rhetorical maneuver, not a meaningful analysis.
Beneath all this lies a scaffolding of deeply problematic assumptions: that Trump alone is a singular moral actor capable of rescuing humanity; that the so-called globalists represent unambiguous, metaphysical evil; that Trump’s indecision is itself a sign of virtue; that eschatological warfare is unavoidable; and that religion is the true underlying force of all geopolitics. These assumptions do not invite thought, but demand belief. The text constructs an internally consistent worldview that is closed to complexity, contradiction, or self-critique. It is not a political argument but a faith-based mythos.
The result is not a coherent political analysis but a piece of political-theological propaganda. It relies on apocalyptic imagery, binary thinking, and charismatic loyalty to suspend the need for ethical consistency or empirical clarity. It is rhetorically powerful only to those already immersed in its worldview. For any philosophically minded or critically engaged reader, the text collapses under its own contradictions. It uses the language of resistance to mask passivity, the language of divinity to avoid responsibility, and the language of struggle to justify submission. Its greatest danger lies in this: not that it argues for a flawed politics, but that it replaces argument with myth and encourages the reader to do the same.
Is it reasonable to put this on Trump? Has any man ever withstood such enemies as Trump, in a very high stakes and unpredictable situation? I hope for a miracle that derails these wars, but otherwise a lot of suffering is here and compounding. The thing that must be avoided is becoming unavoidable .
Sr Dugin, en Trump no afinco esperanza alguna, por lo que le había leído a Usted y a Estulin entre otros, creí que Trump daría el paso de fe por una causa civilizatoria sensata, pero no, solo aspavientos narcisistas es lo que emana, como uno más de los que lo antecedieron. Total, los análisis apuntan una vez más a equivocaciones, señalando que Trump podría ser el que, por parte de EeUu se le plante a los globalistas. Personal y extrañamente a través de dos sueños vi a Trump, primero, no subir a la presidencia de manera consecutiva y segundo, cuando atentaron contra él, vi que se salvaba porque como dije en sueños extraños estuve ahí. Ahora, mirando la realidad mundial y siguiendo a pie puntilla los conflictos mundiales, Trump por su ignorancia, por su ensimismamiento, por su narsicismo, por su edad, será boicoteado, domado, por su entorno traicionero que él mismo nombró y por poderes contrarios a los intereses de EeUu de Trump., que están anclados como neocoms dentro de Norteamérica, Londres y Europa, así como como el poder sionista que hace lo que quiere de frente y a espaldas de Trump y, este no dirá ni moverá nada para parar la debacle que no OS viene encima. Ojalá lo lea, abrazo desde Bogotá
Professor, I have the utmost respect for your judgment. I understand that there is no alternative at this point other than Trump; he is truly the only opportunity, but he appears susceptible to the narratives of the deep state. They knew they couldn't trap him on the Russia front, so they baited him with Judeo-Christianism. Although I pray for the opposite, I believe that this will lead to the defeat of Trumpism unless he takes radical measures to break free.
And not only the defeat of Trumpism.. he is he is symbolically the West’s internal katechon. If he resists more war in the Middle East, he prolongs a multipolar “breathing-space” for civilisation, but, if he yields, he quite literally lets chaos loose. Even Trump’s hesitation is meaningful, he fact that he “might” say no to war keeps open an alternative future. One can hope!!
trump will act as a businessman in war. profitability and expendability of these endeavors will be the guiding principals of any interaction. sacrifice of potential new citizens to a profitable business decision which includes a remedy to the immigration issue makes it a dual use action with cost saving initiatives and incentives.
"Trump is still the chance for humanity to avoid final catastrophe imposed on us by globalists. It is better to support him, trying to correct and improve his mistakes rather than abandon him at all."
“Nothing to do with Christianity” - what utter nonsense.
The dingbat Christian’s in the US , who support Trump, also support Israel because in their view “Jesus will return to Jerusalem , and if it is controlled by islam , he won’t be able to “ ( or some such nonsense). And that , and that alone is why they support Israel. It has everything to do with the form of Christianity prevalent in the US.
Don't be naive. Since when trump or any western politician olygarch or cultural and scientific elite is to take seriousily??? You joke???? They are all maniacs perverts psychopaths lunatics and professional liers. Justify their's actions is became like them. Mertz now praizes Israel for attacking Iran 😂😂😂 israelis defending Europe like the ukrops 😂😂😂. Mertz is a thing that loves be sodimised is addicted like the Starmer of Uk a pervert and corrupt that pays to male homosexual or bisexual prostitutes tobe sodomised and certainly F. his wife. That's how it looks andat same time "lord" Ali pays his bills and pervetions and dress him and his wife 😂😂😂. That's how the west goes on. Amazing. And I'm refering only to 2 things. But all others are the same yes no need talk about macron and just husband. The sad about all this is that no matter where european or american citizens vote for they eat allways he same soup only flies change. Europe is rulled by public servants that are there only to preserve their's status quo and all the same too maniacs perverts psychopats lunatics.
Nothing will change until a revolution takes place like a french revolution with beheadings. Fortunately demographics in europe are changing fast and the new arrived one of this days will reveal their own power.
Whatever his choices are at this point, it will echo through generations. My prayers go out to him to help keep a clear mind and heart.
LOL
This is what I think as well, though it will take a miracle for Trump to do what he needs to. Perhaps he will have the insight and courage, but I’m not too hopeful. Meanwhile domestic politics are the usual quagmire with the “liberals” or “leftists” without a clue as to what it all means. Between Israel and the US we have two governments run by madmen with completely deluded and confused citizens hopelessly making largely irrelevant noise or going along with mindless gusto. We can only hope the rational leaders of major powers can maintain their sanity and pull through - there are none in Europe other than Orban, they are all madmen too. God help us, but as horrible as it is, man has free will and the power to destroy what has taken so long to build.
Trump seems to be very easily manipulated, very emotional & dumb as a box of frogs on a geopolitical level.
Agree. Look how intelligent calm and strategic thinking Putin and Xi Jinping are. You never see them lose control and threaten others Trump scream and threats every one Trump is like a child and it’s very easy for other leaders to read him and manipulate him Because Trump self believes his a genius he don’t realize how other people play him. The call him TACO president because he constantly change his mind He don’t have a vision or a clear strategy Only MAGA words He talks most about what he wants but not how he will realize it. His legacy will probably be worse than Biden’s Especially if he starts WW 3. All his talk about being a president of peace is pure bull shit. Like other presidents are also Trump controlled by the Zionist mafia and Israel’s puppet and work to keep the Military Industrial Complex MIC running for full speed 24/7.
King of what? Rug pulls?
This text is a highly charged political commentary that blends conspiratorial rhetoric, metaphysical symbolism, and geopolitical judgment. At the level of structure, it is marked by repetition and fragmentation. The phrase “President Trump in spite of all is still the most hated and most attacked person in the world” is repeated almost verbatim, suggesting either a lack of editorial discipline or a deliberate rhetorical echo meant to reinforce an image of martyrdom. Syntax is often loose, grammatically inconsistent, with abrupt transitions and unclear referents—such as “the split of MAGA of not Trump’s wars he still supports”—which adds to the chaotic and unstable tone. Tautology and incoherence appear frequently, with the argument looping on itself rather than developing. Phrases like “not his war” and “not his Epstein list” are rhetorically intriguing but ultimately vague and contradictory. There is a simultaneous attempt to absolve Trump of responsibility for these conflicts while also acknowledging his support for them—a narrative of passive entrapment rather than active agency.
The underlying argument attempts to paint Trump as a misunderstood or manipulated figure, continuing wars that he allegedly does not own. This formulation, however, becomes strained. If he is truly opposed to the wars, why is he supporting them? If they are truly “not his,” what would justify his continued involvement? This internal contradiction allows the speaker to construct a narrative that both excuses Trump and places blame upon him, creating a martyr without agency. At the heart of this rhetorical construction are the figures of the “globalists” and “neocons,” invoked as shadowy antagonists without specific definition. “Globalists” functions here as a floating signifier, often used in far-right discourse as a euphemism for transnational elites, sometimes with antisemitic undertones. “Neocons,” while having a historical grounding in U.S. foreign policy, are collapsed into the same category as the metaphysical enemy—thus losing their particularity and becoming a general symbol of evil.
Metaphysical language appears throughout the text, heightening its mythic tone. The claim that Trump is hesitating “between two metaphysical poles” casts him in a Manichaean drama of cosmic dualism. But this metaphysical framing is philosophically hollow, serving more as ornament than substance. Indecision is rendered into a moral achievement, as if wavering between war and peace is itself virtuous because it signifies some grand internal struggle. This is not only a weak ethical position; it also obfuscates the need for concrete political accountability.
The rhetoric functions through mythologizing and messianism. Trump is described as a tragic king, surrounded by enemies. The Shakespearean echo in “the king in trouble” infuses the text with pathos and fatalism. Such language mythologizes Trump not as a political actor but as a messianic figure enduring trial on behalf of the people. Simultaneously, the claim that he is “the most hated and most attacked person in the world” reinforces his role as a victim and redeemer. This narrative of persecution encourages loyalty by identifying Trump’s suffering with that of the reader or nation. Binarism dominates the logic of the text: Trump versus globalists, good versus evil, Jerusalem versus al-Aqsa. This black-and-white thinking eliminates nuance, replacing geopolitical complexity with cosmic struggle. There is no space for diplomacy, mutual recognition, or complexity—only sides to be taken in a final metaphysical battle.
In the geopolitical dimension, particularly concerning the Middle East, the analysis collapses into crude reductionism. Statements such as “Zionist Israel is absolute enemy of Iran, Shia, Arab and Muslim world” erase the diversity of political opinion and historical nuance in the region. Framing these conflicts as a “duel” between oppositional eschatologies ignores the material, historical, and socio-political conditions driving them. This rhetorical gesture turns real human suffering and conflict into a theological sport. The suggestion to “let them compete in that” implies disengagement and abdication of responsibility. But this contradicts earlier warnings about looming catastrophe, revealing a confused oscillation between isolationism and doomsday interventionism. The claim that the conflict “has nothing to do with Christianity” is both inaccurate and rhetorical. It tries to separate Christian eschatology from political involvement, but this fails to account for the significant role that apocalyptic Christian Zionism plays in U.S. support for Israel, particularly among Trump’s evangelical base. This selective distancing is a rhetorical maneuver, not a meaningful analysis.
Beneath all this lies a scaffolding of deeply problematic assumptions: that Trump alone is a singular moral actor capable of rescuing humanity; that the so-called globalists represent unambiguous, metaphysical evil; that Trump’s indecision is itself a sign of virtue; that eschatological warfare is unavoidable; and that religion is the true underlying force of all geopolitics. These assumptions do not invite thought, but demand belief. The text constructs an internally consistent worldview that is closed to complexity, contradiction, or self-critique. It is not a political argument but a faith-based mythos.
The result is not a coherent political analysis but a piece of political-theological propaganda. It relies on apocalyptic imagery, binary thinking, and charismatic loyalty to suspend the need for ethical consistency or empirical clarity. It is rhetorically powerful only to those already immersed in its worldview. For any philosophically minded or critically engaged reader, the text collapses under its own contradictions. It uses the language of resistance to mask passivity, the language of divinity to avoid responsibility, and the language of struggle to justify submission. Its greatest danger lies in this: not that it argues for a flawed politics, but that it replaces argument with myth and encourages the reader to do the same.
agreed, not Dugin's style either, more counter intelligence twilight language.
Too verbose just to say the author is a fool.
And it took at least one hour to tweak ChatGPT to produce that.
1 hour, no, no, just 5 minutes.
Well, at least we agree on that.
Is it reasonable to put this on Trump? Has any man ever withstood such enemies as Trump, in a very high stakes and unpredictable situation? I hope for a miracle that derails these wars, but otherwise a lot of suffering is here and compounding. The thing that must be avoided is becoming unavoidable .
Sr Dugin, en Trump no afinco esperanza alguna, por lo que le había leído a Usted y a Estulin entre otros, creí que Trump daría el paso de fe por una causa civilizatoria sensata, pero no, solo aspavientos narcisistas es lo que emana, como uno más de los que lo antecedieron. Total, los análisis apuntan una vez más a equivocaciones, señalando que Trump podría ser el que, por parte de EeUu se le plante a los globalistas. Personal y extrañamente a través de dos sueños vi a Trump, primero, no subir a la presidencia de manera consecutiva y segundo, cuando atentaron contra él, vi que se salvaba porque como dije en sueños extraños estuve ahí. Ahora, mirando la realidad mundial y siguiendo a pie puntilla los conflictos mundiales, Trump por su ignorancia, por su ensimismamiento, por su narsicismo, por su edad, será boicoteado, domado, por su entorno traicionero que él mismo nombró y por poderes contrarios a los intereses de EeUu de Trump., que están anclados como neocoms dentro de Norteamérica, Londres y Europa, así como como el poder sionista que hace lo que quiere de frente y a espaldas de Trump y, este no dirá ni moverá nada para parar la debacle que no OS viene encima. Ojalá lo lea, abrazo desde Bogotá
Professor, I have the utmost respect for your judgment. I understand that there is no alternative at this point other than Trump; he is truly the only opportunity, but he appears susceptible to the narratives of the deep state. They knew they couldn't trap him on the Russia front, so they baited him with Judeo-Christianism. Although I pray for the opposite, I believe that this will lead to the defeat of Trumpism unless he takes radical measures to break free.
And not only the defeat of Trumpism.. he is he is symbolically the West’s internal katechon. If he resists more war in the Middle East, he prolongs a multipolar “breathing-space” for civilisation, but, if he yields, he quite literally lets chaos loose. Even Trump’s hesitation is meaningful, he fact that he “might” say no to war keeps open an alternative future. One can hope!!
trump will act as a businessman in war. profitability and expendability of these endeavors will be the guiding principals of any interaction. sacrifice of potential new citizens to a profitable business decision which includes a remedy to the immigration issue makes it a dual use action with cost saving initiatives and incentives.
Questa algida sicurezza mi sconcerta....
my guess is that critical infrastructure of the biolabs has already been moved Back to Africa.
jonestown-haiti-uganda
"Trump is still the chance for humanity to avoid final catastrophe imposed on us by globalists. It is better to support him, trying to correct and improve his mistakes rather than abandon him at all."
You are a fool.
Hope is cowardice to face the facts.
From a Chinese...
Dear Mr Alexander Dugin, go fuck your mama...
“Nothing to do with Christianity” - what utter nonsense.
The dingbat Christian’s in the US , who support Trump, also support Israel because in their view “Jesus will return to Jerusalem , and if it is controlled by islam , he won’t be able to “ ( or some such nonsense). And that , and that alone is why they support Israel. It has everything to do with the form of Christianity prevalent in the US.
Don't be naive. Since when trump or any western politician olygarch or cultural and scientific elite is to take seriousily??? You joke???? They are all maniacs perverts psychopaths lunatics and professional liers. Justify their's actions is became like them. Mertz now praizes Israel for attacking Iran 😂😂😂 israelis defending Europe like the ukrops 😂😂😂. Mertz is a thing that loves be sodimised is addicted like the Starmer of Uk a pervert and corrupt that pays to male homosexual or bisexual prostitutes tobe sodomised and certainly F. his wife. That's how it looks andat same time "lord" Ali pays his bills and pervetions and dress him and his wife 😂😂😂. That's how the west goes on. Amazing. And I'm refering only to 2 things. But all others are the same yes no need talk about macron and just husband. The sad about all this is that no matter where european or american citizens vote for they eat allways he same soup only flies change. Europe is rulled by public servants that are there only to preserve their's status quo and all the same too maniacs perverts psychopats lunatics.
Nothing will change until a revolution takes place like a french revolution with beheadings. Fortunately demographics in europe are changing fast and the new arrived one of this days will reveal their own power.
waki waki Mr. Brain you've been bamboozled !
so much for your multi poler world
if Russia n China doesn't get behind Iran at least with weapones immediately, they will suffer greatly next.
p.s
if you're Putins brain ,God help us all!
How's Daria?
)