War in Ukraine can’t be stopped until the power of globalists is totally dismantled in US and in EU. Only then we can reach some positive results. Not before.
Thank you for this interesting note! But we should look at the root of the problem which to my unlettered mind is somewhere in the history and psychology of the (my) English people.
I too worry that the pressure from the Collective West may tempt Russia into a fatal concession. Regarding treaties, we should recall Britain and America's contemptuous use of the machinery of treaty to dispossess native cultures, and Russia should NOT need to accept this risk for herself.
I truly admire your nation and wish for her leaders, military, common folk, and allies, to continue this difficult task.
"Trump wants to end the war in Ukraine. It is his good will."
Rather, Trump wants to avoid the appearance of Russian victory and Ukraine defeat. This is the key to understanding Trump sending both Kellogg and Witkoff, each with separate and distinct proposals, to Istanbul.
Any agreement reached with cessation of hostilities will be spun as "Russia defeated, Ukraine victorious". Subsequently, just as after Minsk II, Ukraine will have its military greatly expanded, as was done under Trump's first term, and Ukraine will resume the cycle when the right moment arrives after NATO itself is reconstituted.
If we avoid a nuclear conflict in this cycle, the next cycle will surely bring it. The best case scenario is that in the present cycle, Ukraine and NATO are beat down sufficiently, that prior to reconstituting their militaries, Western society, already rapidly approaching the point, will collapse.
Completely concur every thing you opine, not until the sickness that is liberal globalism been completely excised in both the E.U, U.S and its HQ, the U.K will the world be freed from this fraud, the tyranny and wanton abuse that is globalism.
I hope Russia by going to full War, destroying firstly the proxy Nazi regime in Kiev and throughout that corrupted shithole that is Ukraine, will there be any chance of peace, or of a security architecture conducive to long term peace, prosperity and importantly national sovereignty.
In winning the conflict, Russia needs to assert itself and insist arrests will result against all 9f those who have aided, abetted, funded and enabled this criminal behaviour in all its guises to metastasise as we have had to both endure and witness, those responsible need to be charged with the crimes they have perpetrated, not until this outcome has been reached will the world ever enjoy peace, these people as we know from the recent Syrian experience salivate and are adept at ensuring the conflict continues even after a so called peaceful outcome has resulted, the Assad government takedown a shining example of just how the globalists, like a bad stench never ever seem to disappear, outstaying any welcome they might have had, they work to subvert, wear down and then to strike when the moment suits, Assad unfortunately taken down by the Turks and Israel coming together with globalist forces to effect change, Russia cannot, must not allow the same to occasion in Ukraine, or worse, at home in the motherland..
Hence the fight will not be over 7ntil every vestige of the cancer that is globalism has been destroyed, eliminated, any survivors of the ideology fully aware of the fate awaiting them, irrespective of rank, function or role, should they endeavour to keep that fire smouldering, waiting to foment more chaos and misery when it is conducive to do so… I do not want a repeat of Syria, nor of 1990’s Russia.. period, thus time for Russia to go to War, end this conflict.. then to fully impose its will on the outcome.. ensuring such like never recurs, assuring its security and the collective security of E.U, U.S, U.K citizens, the majority of the respective populace who are against this incessant warmongering, death, destruction and sowing of chaos..
Just saying Kia Kaha (stay strong) From New Zealand
This statement reads like an online screed soaked in rage, fantasy, and authoritarian nostalgia. It lashes out at “liberal globalism” as though it were a singular, monstrous force rather than a diverse and flawed but real-world set of policies, institutions, and ideologies. Painting globalism as a “cancer” or a “fraud” makes it easier to hate, but it does nothing to explain or engage with the complexity of the current geopolitical landscape. It reduces all nuance to a cartoonish battle between light and darkness, casting Russia as the last bastion of purity and the West as a demonic hive of corruption.
The language here isn’t just overblown—it’s dangerous. Calling Ukraine a “corrupted shithole” and describing its government as a “proxy Nazi regime” is straight out of a propagandist’s handbook. These are dehumanizing phrases designed to strip people of their agency and worth. The same tactic appears again in references to “globalists” as a lingering “bad stench,” suggesting they are some kind of vermin to be eradicated rather than fellow humans with different views. This is rhetoric aimed at inciting violence, not resolving conflict.
Then there’s the wild conspiracism. The idea that the downfall of Syria was orchestrated by Turkey, Israel, and some amorphous “globalist” cabal defies evidence and reason. It also completely erases the actual Syrian people, their protests, and the brutal repression they faced. It’s not just a distortion of history—it’s a dismissal of lived suffering in favor of a narrative that sees every conflict as the handiwork of an invisible, omnipotent enemy.
At the heart of this rant is a dangerous kind of solutionism: the belief that everything will be fixed if Russia simply goes to war, imposes its will, and purges the ideology of globalism from the earth. This is not a roadmap to peace. It’s a fantasy of conquest, surveillance, and punishment. It does not tolerate dissent or democracy. It promises peace only after complete ideological domination and punishment of “survivors”—language that chillingly echoes totalitarian purges.
And yet, bizarrely, the author claims to speak for the people of the U.S., U.K., and E.U.—the “majority” who supposedly oppose “warmongering.” How this squares with the call for Russia to launch a full-scale war is never explained. The contradiction is glaring: a war to end wars, violence to create peace, authoritarian control to restore sovereignty. These ideas implode under the weight of their own logic.
What the statement ultimately offers is not an argument but a grievance-soaked wish for vengeance. It’s about settling scores, not solving problems. It doesn’t propose diplomacy or justice—it proposes war and retribution. This isn’t realism or strategy. It’s a manifesto for perpetual violence dressed up as liberation.
To take such rhetoric seriously is to invite catastrophe. It’s a vision of a world where force replaces law, where ideology replaces conversation, and where any dissent can be labeled a disease to be “excised.” That’s not sovereignty. That’s tyranny with a patriotic flag pinned to its chest.
Always good to hear another perspective. We need to be questioning everything especially when it serves the globalist bankers and not the general populations.
Mr Trump is a residual byproduct of the simulacrum. He is not the answer as he does not possess the intellectual prowess to subdue the globalist. But my hopes are that his bumbling antics may one day pave the way for the correct person to rise
Trump is like the cork from a bottle of aged wine. The rest of the bottle and its contents was subsumed by the sea, along with the worm eaten ship, in a raging storm. From the unfathomable depths, Trump (aka Biden II) bobs to the surface to be tossed by the storm's wind and waves, tither and yon. The cork, like all flotsam. is fated to be washed up by the tide on an unknown desolate shore.
Dugin conflates the majesty and power of the storm with the cork.
Correct, Mr. Dugin, the ‘decline of western civilisation’ has fundamentally reached its apex - socioeconomic ruin and the EU’s fascist political body - and will end in this young 21st century.
I am very sorry Mr Dugin, your firm believes that Trump is a “master” in USA decision for the near/distant future is a wishful thinking. Trump was elected and financed by the deep, deep State they paid his debts and it’s owed by them. He is slowly but surely building a trap and , I am sure the Russian Federation Leadership are well aware about it. Trump is trying to make happy USA’ s war industrial complex( he just signed a contract selling to South Arabia armaments worth more than three billion dollars). The partition of the world markets between the major Global Powers is not enough to the Nazi Zionist Finance Capital and, Europe is on the brink of bankruptcy, they will do anything to light up the prairie, the only chance they have it to push the USA in a global war against Russia and China and their allies. Hitler tried very hard to avoid the confrontation with Soviet Russia, but , Mr Dugin, you know very well, what they did to push Roosevelt to join the Second World War. The London Rothschilds bankers had ready their Churchill to do the dirty job. And now, they have three drugs’ addicted that will do once more the satanic move towards the Third World War.
In my opinion, Alexander Dugin’s statement is a masterclass in inflammatory rhetoric dressed up as geopolitical insight. It blends insults, conspiracy theories, and moral absolutism into a narrative that’s designed to energize his ideological base while offering no real policy solutions. Let’s break down why this is nothing more than propaganda.
Dugin opens by attacking Kellog, claiming he “speaks with Russia the wrong language” and accusing him of “sabotaging peace.” This is a false dilemma. Either one submits to Russia’s preferred narrative, or they’re sabotaging peace. There’s no room for negotiation, mutual interests, or strategic nuance. It’s a loyalty test, not diplomacy.
He then slams the QUAD for not “helping” India during its border tensions with China, suggesting betrayal. But QUAD isn’t a military alliance like NATO; it’s a strategic dialogue platform. Dugin’s framing deliberately misleads, twisting inaction into evidence of American unreliability. The sarcastic “What an ally!” is pure populist bait.
Next, Dugin pivots to Europe, calling EU leaders “idiots and drug addicts” and citing Spengler’s Decline of the West to back his claim. This is intellectual cosplay. Spengler’s work was a philosophical meditation on cultural cycles, not a playbook for current events. Dugin’s wholesale denunciation of Europe is especially ironic given how much his own Eurasianist philosophy borrows from European thinkers.
When he turns to Putin and Trump, Dugin imagines a world of “masters” who negotiate without interference from lesser figures like Zelensky. He dehumanizes Zelensky as a “terrorist clown” while praising Trump’s supposed sovereignty. Yet, in the same breath, Dugin admits Trump “has no control” over the globalists—contradicting his own argument about Trump’s mastery. It’s a projection of Dugin’s feudal worldview onto international politics.
His insistence that the war in Ukraine “can’t be stopped” until globalists are dismantled is not diplomacy—it’s a revolutionary demand. Framing the war as a metaphysical battle between sovereign powers and globalist puppets erases Ukraine’s agency entirely. It’s a textbook conspiracy narrative, giving Russia moral cover while portraying the West as an amorphous evil.
Dugin’s Nazi label for Zelensky is especially grotesque. It’s historical revisionism and pure propaganda. The real irony is that Russia’s own use of ultranationalist and imperial rhetoric mirrors the very ideologies Dugin pretends to oppose.
Even when Dugin acknowledges that Trump wants to end the war, he reduces it to “good will,” as if global geopolitics revolves around individual whims. He ignores the structural constraints of U.S. institutions, NATO obligations, and international law. His view of Trump as a lone sovereign fighting globalists is detached from political reality.
Finally, Dugin ends with ominous fatalism: “Tomorrow we will see. But it is quite probable that we won’t.” This is classic manipulation. It leaves readers with a sense of impending doom, primed for more radical messaging.
In sum, Dugin’s statement is not serious analysis. It’s ideological warfare disguised as commentary. It simplifies complex realities into good-versus-evil fairy tales, dehumanizes opponents, and offers no practical solutions. It’s not foreign policy. It’s propaganda for an imperialist agenda.
Pienamente d'accordo! Putin deve continuare nella sua missione altrimenti tutto quello che è stato fatto finora è valso vano.
Thank you for this interesting note! But we should look at the root of the problem which to my unlettered mind is somewhere in the history and psychology of the (my) English people.
I too worry that the pressure from the Collective West may tempt Russia into a fatal concession. Regarding treaties, we should recall Britain and America's contemptuous use of the machinery of treaty to dispossess native cultures, and Russia should NOT need to accept this risk for herself.
I truly admire your nation and wish for her leaders, military, common folk, and allies, to continue this difficult task.
"Trump wants to end the war in Ukraine. It is his good will."
Rather, Trump wants to avoid the appearance of Russian victory and Ukraine defeat. This is the key to understanding Trump sending both Kellogg and Witkoff, each with separate and distinct proposals, to Istanbul.
Any agreement reached with cessation of hostilities will be spun as "Russia defeated, Ukraine victorious". Subsequently, just as after Minsk II, Ukraine will have its military greatly expanded, as was done under Trump's first term, and Ukraine will resume the cycle when the right moment arrives after NATO itself is reconstituted.
If we avoid a nuclear conflict in this cycle, the next cycle will surely bring it. The best case scenario is that in the present cycle, Ukraine and NATO are beat down sufficiently, that prior to reconstituting their militaries, Western society, already rapidly approaching the point, will collapse.
Completely concur every thing you opine, not until the sickness that is liberal globalism been completely excised in both the E.U, U.S and its HQ, the U.K will the world be freed from this fraud, the tyranny and wanton abuse that is globalism.
I hope Russia by going to full War, destroying firstly the proxy Nazi regime in Kiev and throughout that corrupted shithole that is Ukraine, will there be any chance of peace, or of a security architecture conducive to long term peace, prosperity and importantly national sovereignty.
In winning the conflict, Russia needs to assert itself and insist arrests will result against all 9f those who have aided, abetted, funded and enabled this criminal behaviour in all its guises to metastasise as we have had to both endure and witness, those responsible need to be charged with the crimes they have perpetrated, not until this outcome has been reached will the world ever enjoy peace, these people as we know from the recent Syrian experience salivate and are adept at ensuring the conflict continues even after a so called peaceful outcome has resulted, the Assad government takedown a shining example of just how the globalists, like a bad stench never ever seem to disappear, outstaying any welcome they might have had, they work to subvert, wear down and then to strike when the moment suits, Assad unfortunately taken down by the Turks and Israel coming together with globalist forces to effect change, Russia cannot, must not allow the same to occasion in Ukraine, or worse, at home in the motherland..
Hence the fight will not be over 7ntil every vestige of the cancer that is globalism has been destroyed, eliminated, any survivors of the ideology fully aware of the fate awaiting them, irrespective of rank, function or role, should they endeavour to keep that fire smouldering, waiting to foment more chaos and misery when it is conducive to do so… I do not want a repeat of Syria, nor of 1990’s Russia.. period, thus time for Russia to go to War, end this conflict.. then to fully impose its will on the outcome.. ensuring such like never recurs, assuring its security and the collective security of E.U, U.S, U.K citizens, the majority of the respective populace who are against this incessant warmongering, death, destruction and sowing of chaos..
Just saying Kia Kaha (stay strong) From New Zealand
This statement reads like an online screed soaked in rage, fantasy, and authoritarian nostalgia. It lashes out at “liberal globalism” as though it were a singular, monstrous force rather than a diverse and flawed but real-world set of policies, institutions, and ideologies. Painting globalism as a “cancer” or a “fraud” makes it easier to hate, but it does nothing to explain or engage with the complexity of the current geopolitical landscape. It reduces all nuance to a cartoonish battle between light and darkness, casting Russia as the last bastion of purity and the West as a demonic hive of corruption.
The language here isn’t just overblown—it’s dangerous. Calling Ukraine a “corrupted shithole” and describing its government as a “proxy Nazi regime” is straight out of a propagandist’s handbook. These are dehumanizing phrases designed to strip people of their agency and worth. The same tactic appears again in references to “globalists” as a lingering “bad stench,” suggesting they are some kind of vermin to be eradicated rather than fellow humans with different views. This is rhetoric aimed at inciting violence, not resolving conflict.
Then there’s the wild conspiracism. The idea that the downfall of Syria was orchestrated by Turkey, Israel, and some amorphous “globalist” cabal defies evidence and reason. It also completely erases the actual Syrian people, their protests, and the brutal repression they faced. It’s not just a distortion of history—it’s a dismissal of lived suffering in favor of a narrative that sees every conflict as the handiwork of an invisible, omnipotent enemy.
At the heart of this rant is a dangerous kind of solutionism: the belief that everything will be fixed if Russia simply goes to war, imposes its will, and purges the ideology of globalism from the earth. This is not a roadmap to peace. It’s a fantasy of conquest, surveillance, and punishment. It does not tolerate dissent or democracy. It promises peace only after complete ideological domination and punishment of “survivors”—language that chillingly echoes totalitarian purges.
And yet, bizarrely, the author claims to speak for the people of the U.S., U.K., and E.U.—the “majority” who supposedly oppose “warmongering.” How this squares with the call for Russia to launch a full-scale war is never explained. The contradiction is glaring: a war to end wars, violence to create peace, authoritarian control to restore sovereignty. These ideas implode under the weight of their own logic.
What the statement ultimately offers is not an argument but a grievance-soaked wish for vengeance. It’s about settling scores, not solving problems. It doesn’t propose diplomacy or justice—it proposes war and retribution. This isn’t realism or strategy. It’s a manifesto for perpetual violence dressed up as liberation.
To take such rhetoric seriously is to invite catastrophe. It’s a vision of a world where force replaces law, where ideology replaces conversation, and where any dissent can be labeled a disease to be “excised.” That’s not sovereignty. That’s tyranny with a patriotic flag pinned to its chest.
Always good to hear another perspective. We need to be questioning everything especially when it serves the globalist bankers and not the general populations.
Mr Trump is a residual byproduct of the simulacrum. He is not the answer as he does not possess the intellectual prowess to subdue the globalist. But my hopes are that his bumbling antics may one day pave the way for the correct person to rise
Trump is like the cork from a bottle of aged wine. The rest of the bottle and its contents was subsumed by the sea, along with the worm eaten ship, in a raging storm. From the unfathomable depths, Trump (aka Biden II) bobs to the surface to be tossed by the storm's wind and waves, tither and yon. The cork, like all flotsam. is fated to be washed up by the tide on an unknown desolate shore.
Dugin conflates the majesty and power of the storm with the cork.
Correct, Mr. Dugin, the ‘decline of western civilisation’ has fundamentally reached its apex - socioeconomic ruin and the EU’s fascist political body - and will end in this young 21st century.
I am very sorry Mr Dugin, your firm believes that Trump is a “master” in USA decision for the near/distant future is a wishful thinking. Trump was elected and financed by the deep, deep State they paid his debts and it’s owed by them. He is slowly but surely building a trap and , I am sure the Russian Federation Leadership are well aware about it. Trump is trying to make happy USA’ s war industrial complex( he just signed a contract selling to South Arabia armaments worth more than three billion dollars). The partition of the world markets between the major Global Powers is not enough to the Nazi Zionist Finance Capital and, Europe is on the brink of bankruptcy, they will do anything to light up the prairie, the only chance they have it to push the USA in a global war against Russia and China and their allies. Hitler tried very hard to avoid the confrontation with Soviet Russia, but , Mr Dugin, you know very well, what they did to push Roosevelt to join the Second World War. The London Rothschilds bankers had ready their Churchill to do the dirty job. And now, they have three drugs’ addicted that will do once more the satanic move towards the Third World War.
In my opinion, Alexander Dugin’s statement is a masterclass in inflammatory rhetoric dressed up as geopolitical insight. It blends insults, conspiracy theories, and moral absolutism into a narrative that’s designed to energize his ideological base while offering no real policy solutions. Let’s break down why this is nothing more than propaganda.
Dugin opens by attacking Kellog, claiming he “speaks with Russia the wrong language” and accusing him of “sabotaging peace.” This is a false dilemma. Either one submits to Russia’s preferred narrative, or they’re sabotaging peace. There’s no room for negotiation, mutual interests, or strategic nuance. It’s a loyalty test, not diplomacy.
He then slams the QUAD for not “helping” India during its border tensions with China, suggesting betrayal. But QUAD isn’t a military alliance like NATO; it’s a strategic dialogue platform. Dugin’s framing deliberately misleads, twisting inaction into evidence of American unreliability. The sarcastic “What an ally!” is pure populist bait.
Next, Dugin pivots to Europe, calling EU leaders “idiots and drug addicts” and citing Spengler’s Decline of the West to back his claim. This is intellectual cosplay. Spengler’s work was a philosophical meditation on cultural cycles, not a playbook for current events. Dugin’s wholesale denunciation of Europe is especially ironic given how much his own Eurasianist philosophy borrows from European thinkers.
When he turns to Putin and Trump, Dugin imagines a world of “masters” who negotiate without interference from lesser figures like Zelensky. He dehumanizes Zelensky as a “terrorist clown” while praising Trump’s supposed sovereignty. Yet, in the same breath, Dugin admits Trump “has no control” over the globalists—contradicting his own argument about Trump’s mastery. It’s a projection of Dugin’s feudal worldview onto international politics.
His insistence that the war in Ukraine “can’t be stopped” until globalists are dismantled is not diplomacy—it’s a revolutionary demand. Framing the war as a metaphysical battle between sovereign powers and globalist puppets erases Ukraine’s agency entirely. It’s a textbook conspiracy narrative, giving Russia moral cover while portraying the West as an amorphous evil.
Dugin’s Nazi label for Zelensky is especially grotesque. It’s historical revisionism and pure propaganda. The real irony is that Russia’s own use of ultranationalist and imperial rhetoric mirrors the very ideologies Dugin pretends to oppose.
Even when Dugin acknowledges that Trump wants to end the war, he reduces it to “good will,” as if global geopolitics revolves around individual whims. He ignores the structural constraints of U.S. institutions, NATO obligations, and international law. His view of Trump as a lone sovereign fighting globalists is detached from political reality.
Finally, Dugin ends with ominous fatalism: “Tomorrow we will see. But it is quite probable that we won’t.” This is classic manipulation. It leaves readers with a sense of impending doom, primed for more radical messaging.
In sum, Dugin’s statement is not serious analysis. It’s ideological warfare disguised as commentary. It simplifies complex realities into good-versus-evil fairy tales, dehumanizes opponents, and offers no practical solutions. It’s not foreign policy. It’s propaganda for an imperialist agenda.