To see Mr Musk as someone pragmatic equals as not knowing his objective way of thinking, his history, family history and his complete submission to Nazi Zionism. He is of the most cunning nature and has payed for Trumpโs expenses for its election. Any one currently hoping about what will happen next, ignore that USA,Zionists and most of the industrialised Nation need War: the Third World War.
I think that united States of sodom will keep it's empire ideology with trump or without trump basically nothing will change only small talk will increase. All internal problems will not be fixed particularly the ones related to healthcare and education and military industrial complex. And I'm not talking about american debt and dedolarisation that i hope will increase.
The best we can do with Trump (assuming he lives through the 4 years) is to slow down the deterioration. The real heavy lifting has to be done by the people. If the people as a whole do not go through significant change (unlikely) things will flip back to the old path after some years until it his the edge of the cliff.
"Imperialism is the political expression of the process of capital accumulation in its competitive struggle for the remnants of the non-capitalist world milieu, which has not yet been seized. Geographically, this environment still covers the widest areas of the Earth today. However, measured by the enormous mass of the already accumulated capital of the old capitalist countries, which is struggling for the sales opportunities for its surplus product as well as for capitalization opportunities for its surplus value, measured further by the rapidity with which areas of pre-capitalist cultures are being transformed into capitalist ones today, in other words, measured by the already achieved high degree of development of the productive forces of capital, the field still remaining for its expansion appears as a small remnant. The international approach of capital on the world stage is shaped accordingly. With the high level of development and the increasingly fierce competition of the capitalist countries for the acquisition of non-capitalist territories, imperialism is increasing in energy and violence, both in its aggressive action against the non-capitalist world and in the intensification of the contradictions between the competing capitalist countries. But the more violently, energetically and thoroughly imperialism worries about the downfall of non-capitalist cultures, the more quickly it removes the ground from under the feet of capital accumulation. Imperialism is just as much a historical method of prolonging the existence of capital as it is the surest means of objectively setting a goal for its existence in the shortest possible way."
This assessment of Rosa Luxemburg, written in 1913, is essentially valid to this day. I think it is no mistake to assume that what is called globalism today is classical imperialism, supplemented by its financialist aspects. The underlying belief of this concept was and still is that it is possible to make more money out of money. The explanation of how this can be possible at all is practically the content of the entire book "The Accumulation of Capital". The cited explanation for this is, to a certain extent, the guideline according to which the US establishment acts - so basically they are the disciples of Rosa Luxemburg at heart. But one can understand this only if one separates the capitalist concept of "ownership of means of production" from the financialist concept of "multiplication of monetary assets" and recognizes them as independent functional areas. While the former still leaves open the possibility of creating prosperity, the second is characterized only by "greed for more" in monetary terms.
Also the Trumpism (?) will not mean a departure from this, the sequence of the US presidents is only relevant insofar as the methods of collecting more money vary and the respective supporter establishment may benefit from it. This is not surprising in this respect, but it becomes interesting when the mechanisms to make this accumulation of financial assets possible are up for discussion. To make a long discussion short: it is, of course, the national debt that makes the accumulation of financial assets possible, as well as the subsequent immoral wealth spread. Public debt is a sine qua non condition for financialism, so it is always the same "pragmatism" that drives the level of public debt. Since US economists do not have a serious monetary theory, there is no alternative to it.
Therefore, it is useless to speculate about what the future will look like, because the basic lines are outlined by the addiction to increasing financial wealth. If you like, this is the genetic code that shapes the establishment and only allows him a tunnel view of the golden calf. Therefore, it would actually be more important to analyze which institutionalizations make people act the way they do, because people are not naturally greedy for money. And then to ask oneself what needs to be done so that one's own community does not also fall into this trap and ultimately goes through the same lines of development in order to end up exactly where the USA is today. If multipolarity is to mean anything, then there must be a change in the institutionalizations perceived as "natural", otherwise the future prospects for the new "pole" are nothing more than a duplication of the existing one.
"Therefore, it would actually be more important to analyze which institutionalizations make people act the way they do, because people are not naturally greedy for money."
I agree, and where better to look than towards the centuries old schoolsystem that basically has not changed, but evolved and radically expanded to make us obedient to aformentioned ideology?
Trump is a "businessman" not ruler or even a politician any more than FDR i.e. "The business of America is business."
It's an old Whig idea, that big business needs big gov't to promote laissez-faire, free enterprise which makes sense only in the context of the 18th Century Protestant agrarian Colonies having been repressed in manufacure and commerce by British mercantile restrictions.
The Current Republican Party absorbed the Whigs in 1854 leading into the Civil War, essentially a labor dispute as Marx described it. No surpirse, more labor disputes and violence followed thru Reconstruction and into the Progressive Era.
Trump promises major reform and no more wars much like FDR's New Deal and WW2.
Trump has little idea what's going on. He pushed Biden's peace plan with Macron and Zelensky and Mr. Putin consequently wiped out Kiev's power grid.
Trump obviously does not understand the optons of a central power.
He does not see the Jewish State much beyond WW2 Mythos.
Trump could end it all by pledging to stop al lweapons and funidng "on my first day in office" but obviously likes that "leveage" which, however, he doesn't have anymore.
Russia should defeat Ukraine before Jan 20 and be ready to confront "Zion Don" in the Middle East.
Iran, Turkey and Russia have their quarrels but this is essentially the Old World vs the New World in which Netanyahu cannot continue attacking everyone in sight anymore than Zelensky.
Trump sounds good to American bashed by Liberals for so long but the alignment is only coincidntal, not pragmatic.
No one in America wants another war for Israel except Trump, his entire Zionist cabinet an congress.
This will end on battlefields and not end well for CONUS.
Unconvincing. It is obvious that global liberalism is untenable. But it is equally obvious that it will not be possible to make America great without global liberalism. It is impossible to create as much value through the production of goods as it was possible to create through liberal financial machinations.Thus, Trump is at a dead end. Their only exit is where the entrance was. They need to abandon the idea of bringing back the power of the United States. This is the only way to avoid disaster. But it will be very difficult to do this, and the standard of living of Americans will fall many times anyway.
What will happen when Trump becomes a working president is unpredictable. Not because of Trump himself but because of the strong resistance and enmity from the siting government, corrupt officials, mainstream media and of course the CIA with all its countless puppets willing and indoctrinated to do everything possible to prevent him to succeed in any way.
Trumpโs perspective in geopolitics are no different from the Bidenโs in the Middle East the way he talks about Iran and China. But he has a different approach than the spineless neoliberals Bidenโs. He solve everything with communication and negotiation and seems very respectful towards his colleagues and counterparts except China and Iran.
Wonder what he has in mind?
Well the truth is that Israel with its zionist ideology and Mossad see itself as the real power in The Middle East and the USA is only playing along as a puppet to Israel. The Zionist spirit and ideology has awakened in Israelโs government which dream of a greater Israel but will have some competition from Turkey which also dream of a new Ottoman Empire. So it will be interesting to see how this will work out with Trump as president. I know the Zionists are running the show in Washington DC. If Tump survives more assassin attempts until he is in office most threats are eliminated or at least localized. This time around Trump is not totally alone in Washington DC. Tulsi and Kennedy and a few is
a different ball game than in 2016-2020. The biggest problem is the CIA with its puppets hidden all over the place. We can be pretty sure that most of these guys are well trained and indoctrinated narcissists and psychopaths so they are very dangerous.
โAllโ politicians at the level of The White House are narcissists but you really want a thick skinned narcissist on your team fighting for your rights, interests and topics and not an empath in that war of back stabbing. By the way Trump seems ok to have a narcissistic style compared to the lying and smiling psychopaths on the dems team.
One question: just how much is the cost of a subscription to Duginโs works on Arktos? You are asking people to sign up without telling them what they are going to pay!
Compared to the psychopaths on the left I would rather prefer to have Trump and Musk on my team even if they have some big flaws in their personalities and some broken promises.
To see Mr Musk as someone pragmatic equals as not knowing his objective way of thinking, his history, family history and his complete submission to Nazi Zionism. He is of the most cunning nature and has payed for Trumpโs expenses for its election. Any one currently hoping about what will happen next, ignore that USA,Zionists and most of the industrialised Nation need War: the Third World War.
๐คฃ๐๐คฃ
Elon is an idiot ๐คฃ
Understatement
๐คฃ
I think that united States of sodom will keep it's empire ideology with trump or without trump basically nothing will change only small talk will increase. All internal problems will not be fixed particularly the ones related to healthcare and education and military industrial complex. And I'm not talking about american debt and dedolarisation that i hope will increase.
The best we can do with Trump (assuming he lives through the 4 years) is to slow down the deterioration. The real heavy lifting has to be done by the people. If the people as a whole do not go through significant change (unlikely) things will flip back to the old path after some years until it his the edge of the cliff.
"Imperialism is the political expression of the process of capital accumulation in its competitive struggle for the remnants of the non-capitalist world milieu, which has not yet been seized. Geographically, this environment still covers the widest areas of the Earth today. However, measured by the enormous mass of the already accumulated capital of the old capitalist countries, which is struggling for the sales opportunities for its surplus product as well as for capitalization opportunities for its surplus value, measured further by the rapidity with which areas of pre-capitalist cultures are being transformed into capitalist ones today, in other words, measured by the already achieved high degree of development of the productive forces of capital, the field still remaining for its expansion appears as a small remnant. The international approach of capital on the world stage is shaped accordingly. With the high level of development and the increasingly fierce competition of the capitalist countries for the acquisition of non-capitalist territories, imperialism is increasing in energy and violence, both in its aggressive action against the non-capitalist world and in the intensification of the contradictions between the competing capitalist countries. But the more violently, energetically and thoroughly imperialism worries about the downfall of non-capitalist cultures, the more quickly it removes the ground from under the feet of capital accumulation. Imperialism is just as much a historical method of prolonging the existence of capital as it is the surest means of objectively setting a goal for its existence in the shortest possible way."
This assessment of Rosa Luxemburg, written in 1913, is essentially valid to this day. I think it is no mistake to assume that what is called globalism today is classical imperialism, supplemented by its financialist aspects. The underlying belief of this concept was and still is that it is possible to make more money out of money. The explanation of how this can be possible at all is practically the content of the entire book "The Accumulation of Capital". The cited explanation for this is, to a certain extent, the guideline according to which the US establishment acts - so basically they are the disciples of Rosa Luxemburg at heart. But one can understand this only if one separates the capitalist concept of "ownership of means of production" from the financialist concept of "multiplication of monetary assets" and recognizes them as independent functional areas. While the former still leaves open the possibility of creating prosperity, the second is characterized only by "greed for more" in monetary terms.
Also the Trumpism (?) will not mean a departure from this, the sequence of the US presidents is only relevant insofar as the methods of collecting more money vary and the respective supporter establishment may benefit from it. This is not surprising in this respect, but it becomes interesting when the mechanisms to make this accumulation of financial assets possible are up for discussion. To make a long discussion short: it is, of course, the national debt that makes the accumulation of financial assets possible, as well as the subsequent immoral wealth spread. Public debt is a sine qua non condition for financialism, so it is always the same "pragmatism" that drives the level of public debt. Since US economists do not have a serious monetary theory, there is no alternative to it.
Therefore, it is useless to speculate about what the future will look like, because the basic lines are outlined by the addiction to increasing financial wealth. If you like, this is the genetic code that shapes the establishment and only allows him a tunnel view of the golden calf. Therefore, it would actually be more important to analyze which institutionalizations make people act the way they do, because people are not naturally greedy for money. And then to ask oneself what needs to be done so that one's own community does not also fall into this trap and ultimately goes through the same lines of development in order to end up exactly where the USA is today. If multipolarity is to mean anything, then there must be a change in the institutionalizations perceived as "natural", otherwise the future prospects for the new "pole" are nothing more than a duplication of the existing one.
"Therefore, it would actually be more important to analyze which institutionalizations make people act the way they do, because people are not naturally greedy for money."
I agree, and where better to look than towards the centuries old schoolsystem that basically has not changed, but evolved and radically expanded to make us obedient to aformentioned ideology?
Trump is a "businessman" not ruler or even a politician any more than FDR i.e. "The business of America is business."
It's an old Whig idea, that big business needs big gov't to promote laissez-faire, free enterprise which makes sense only in the context of the 18th Century Protestant agrarian Colonies having been repressed in manufacure and commerce by British mercantile restrictions.
The Current Republican Party absorbed the Whigs in 1854 leading into the Civil War, essentially a labor dispute as Marx described it. No surpirse, more labor disputes and violence followed thru Reconstruction and into the Progressive Era.
Trump promises major reform and no more wars much like FDR's New Deal and WW2.
Trump has little idea what's going on. He pushed Biden's peace plan with Macron and Zelensky and Mr. Putin consequently wiped out Kiev's power grid.
Trump obviously does not understand the optons of a central power.
He does not see the Jewish State much beyond WW2 Mythos.
Trump could end it all by pledging to stop al lweapons and funidng "on my first day in office" but obviously likes that "leveage" which, however, he doesn't have anymore.
Russia should defeat Ukraine before Jan 20 and be ready to confront "Zion Don" in the Middle East.
Iran, Turkey and Russia have their quarrels but this is essentially the Old World vs the New World in which Netanyahu cannot continue attacking everyone in sight anymore than Zelensky.
Trump sounds good to American bashed by Liberals for so long but the alignment is only coincidntal, not pragmatic.
No one in America wants another war for Israel except Trump, his entire Zionist cabinet an congress.
This will end on battlefields and not end well for CONUS.
Unconvincing. It is obvious that global liberalism is untenable. But it is equally obvious that it will not be possible to make America great without global liberalism. It is impossible to create as much value through the production of goods as it was possible to create through liberal financial machinations.Thus, Trump is at a dead end. Their only exit is where the entrance was. They need to abandon the idea of bringing back the power of the United States. This is the only way to avoid disaster. But it will be very difficult to do this, and the standard of living of Americans will fall many times anyway.
What will happen when Trump becomes a working president is unpredictable. Not because of Trump himself but because of the strong resistance and enmity from the siting government, corrupt officials, mainstream media and of course the CIA with all its countless puppets willing and indoctrinated to do everything possible to prevent him to succeed in any way.
Trumpโs perspective in geopolitics are no different from the Bidenโs in the Middle East the way he talks about Iran and China. But he has a different approach than the spineless neoliberals Bidenโs. He solve everything with communication and negotiation and seems very respectful towards his colleagues and counterparts except China and Iran.
Wonder what he has in mind?
Well the truth is that Israel with its zionist ideology and Mossad see itself as the real power in The Middle East and the USA is only playing along as a puppet to Israel. The Zionist spirit and ideology has awakened in Israelโs government which dream of a greater Israel but will have some competition from Turkey which also dream of a new Ottoman Empire. So it will be interesting to see how this will work out with Trump as president. I know the Zionists are running the show in Washington DC. If Tump survives more assassin attempts until he is in office most threats are eliminated or at least localized. This time around Trump is not totally alone in Washington DC. Tulsi and Kennedy and a few is
a different ball game than in 2016-2020. The biggest problem is the CIA with its puppets hidden all over the place. We can be pretty sure that most of these guys are well trained and indoctrinated narcissists and psychopaths so they are very dangerous.
Ummm... Trump is also a narcissist and a psychopath ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
โAllโ politicians at the level of The White House are narcissists but you really want a thick skinned narcissist on your team fighting for your rights, interests and topics and not an empath in that war of back stabbing. By the way Trump seems ok to have a narcissistic style compared to the lying and smiling psychopaths on the dems team.
It wonโt go through! Thanks
One question: just how much is the cost of a subscription to Duginโs works on Arktos? You are asking people to sign up without telling them what they are going to pay!
Musk and Trump are both abject idiots๐ They're only in this for the money.
Compared to the psychopaths on the left I would rather prefer to have Trump and Musk on my team even if they have some big flaws in their personalities and some broken promises.
๐คก