Elon Musk and Peter Thiel represent a Silicon Valley rebellion against globalist control, positioning themselves as architects of an alternative ideology.
If it's not a party for and lead by the American founding stock families, it's a party maintained by treasonous foreigners. Musk, and especially Thiel, represent the pinnacle of globalist forces with their technology that seeks to transform the world into an AI surveillance state, unified by transhumanist brain chips. Very clearly these people are enemies to our folk who must be rejected.
We appear to have lost everyone and everything some time in the late 1800s - early 1900s. There is no political solution. The only option is to colldctivize with members of your respective folk and develop self sufficuent homestead beyond the technological system.
Right. Much people, or some, are doing that. Many other still inhabit the cities, as they can work better there, but indeed within their montruosities...
Success in business almost never translates to success in politics. Musk and Theil are welded on to the military industrial complex, they are not agents of change , nor is Trump as you now admit , after pushing the theory that he was up until a month ago. Civilisational collapse is no respecter of persons, (or theories) it has it’s own inexorable logic.
Still civilizational collapse is caused by human beings, surely in a long time, and so it can be canged or transmuted throug human beings, the maximum myth of the are the avatars. Musk is a kind of alien avatar of our days...
The concept of the “Avatar” comes from the Hindu tradition in which it is linked to cosmic cycles of creation, maintenance and destruction. The rise and fall of civilisations is an insignificant cycle in these much larger cycles. It goes without saying the life of an individual human being is utterly insignificant. The conversations between Arjuna and Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita summarise this view of the powerlessness of men.
If you think a morally decrepit human being like Musk is an avatar, it is a sad reflection on your understanding of the term, which you perhaps got from it’s debased usage in computer gaming.
Mr Dugin I unfortunately think you're wrong on how subversive this seemingly "right wing" tech bros are, when push comes to shove all their care about is their companies and extracting as much money as they can from people. Inifinite Indian immigrants on cheap labour with visas tied to the company, and free trade being 2 areas very recently they've clearly gone against MAGA and the interests of the domestic population. They're hyper capitalists, sometimes they can LARP as America First, but really they're just big business first
I wrote a book about a third party in the USA more than 10 years ago. Now I have come to the conclusion that we need to transition away from politics as the answer. Especially centralized power in Washington is dangerous. Individual rights must be respected above an artificial state or corporation. This requires a stronger universal moral code. Some call this a nonaggression principle. No force, fraud or coercion allowed except in true self defense. This would effectively outlaw enforced taxes, large militaries, intrusions into one’s personal life. It would require a high level of cooperation among people for common infrastructure, etc.
Honestly, I don’t think a third party is really an American thing. If the U.S. ever wanted a real multi-party system, it would need a complete refoundation from the ground up. The way the system is built, first-past-the-post voting, the Electoral College, winner-takes-all districts, it’s designed to reinforce the two-party setup. Any third party that emerges ends up being absorbed, neutralized, or used to shift the balance inside one of the two big blocks. That’s just how the machine works.
This is the American state’s political bicycle: it moves forward on two wheels, Democrats and Republicans, always in motion, always leaning a little one way or the other, but never tipping over completely. Third parties don’t last long; they’re more like temporary pressure valves, symptoms of something the system can’t fully digest. We’ve seen this again and again: from the Populists to Perot to whatever Andrew Yang is trying now. Either they get swallowed, or they fade.
So yeah, the idea that Musk, Thiel, or whoever could build a lasting third force misunderstands how deep the institutional reflexes of the American system really go. If you really wanted to change that, you’d have to tear down and rebuild the whole framework. And that’s not on the table, not legally, not culturally, not even imaginatively, right now.
I agree that a third party is not really workable in America. What they can do is tilt a close race by joining forces with one of the major parties. Like RFK did in the recent election by joining Trump. In exchange he was put in charge of the health agencies. Other third parties refuse to join one party or the other. They do not leverage their position to deliver some votes to one party in exchange for a position of power in the next government. Instead they hope to start a movement, but fade away or remain a tiny fringe party with no influence. Another option is for a strong leader to come along and change the dynamics within a party for better or worse. I feel that real change comes from outside the parties. Then the two parties have to react or become less relevant. Of course ultimately they listen to their biggest donors. That’s why I stopped voting. Money talks and I don’t have millions or billions or own a corporation. I focus on moving toward a voluntaryist world.
That is for the net decades just a bright utopia. Mas is still so much in survival mood, that they easily become agressors. To become saints, or very ethic persons, are not objectives of tthe majorith...
This might be a rebellion against globalist control, but would world division into technates really be a better option for humanity? I don't think so.
(See what Peter Thiel is bragging about. Anyone bragging about producing more deadly weapons is so clearly a psychopath...)
The only good alternative for humanity is BRICS, i.e. cooperation among sovereign nations.
We don't need billionaires. They have too much money and it got into their head. We will have to disposses them of their filthy wealth and create a more fair society with lesser gaps between classes. It can be don, I know it from Yugoslavia. Gaps between rich and ordinary people were never as huge as in the West. From what I can see, gaps in Russia and China are also not so huge.
Other “Third Parties” (Libertarian, Constitution, Green) already exist. The issue they all face is ballot access (something the two establishment parties conspired to make harder after Ron Paul and Ross Perot), debate access (the mainstream media can change the rules to disqualify or allow candidates at will), name recognition of candidates (Musk won’t be running), and money. Neither his fame nor money will solve three of those problems.
Will the America party be a party for Americans, or just another party for the transnational moneylenders in power with either one of them, creating the money supply with each loan either in rubles in Russia or in USD in the USA, or soon with the CBDC of their central banks? I haven't seen Elon, Trump, Putin or Dugin take on that issue. While China keeps growing in wealth and strength because most of their banking system is state-controlled, and Germany remains subdued because their local not-for-profit Sparkassen make some 80 percent of their Euros. That is the religious question still unanswered.
Musk’s previous adventures were doomed to be failures, in practice they become an infinite resource of Finance Capita, why ? This the question Mr Dugin should have put to himself ! Musk isn’t a self made billionaire! Do some research Mr Dugin about Musk’s father and Mother , to start, then it would also be helpful to have some basic information about Finance Capital production and accumulation. Finally, Musk doesn’t own the billions that he is using to develop the most advanced, sophisticated psychological tools used by Finance Capital Investments for maximum Profit. We don’t live in a metaphysical dimension, we live in a material dimension in societies divided in classes where the ruling Elites don’t care a fig, don’t hold any compassionate feelings for the billions of People who are the real producers of any Nation Wealth. Let’s be honest for once! Musk, if ever gets to the helm of Power in America will be only at one condition: to serve the Zionist’s Dream of a World single government that will gradually reduce the world population to less than a billion; serving the privileged status of the “Chosen People” ! The Third World War is the Largest Financial Investment ever made by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Soros, Gates etc. Musk is going to be another Harlequin, hypocrite, ruthless and faithfully executing the Zionists’ Satanic Masonic Programme.
I feel humbled that “someone” ,have paid attention to my suffered reflection. I hold no ambitions in my life, it’s a stage reached after long, hard struggle against my main enemy, namely my self! I have become selfless, love life and feel alive only through my search for the Truth, our common Truth. In the Universe, the little we know about it , nothing appears to be divine, everything moves to the speed of light only to its own end! We deliberately choose to ignore the only TRUTH, THAT’S THE REASON, WE ARE JUST ANIMALS! ANIMALS WITH A BRAIN WE HARDLY USE.
Love him or loathe him, Musk has tapped into something real. His war on wokeism isn’t a PR gimmick—it’s a calculated rebellion against a liberal orthodoxy that has become increasingly rigid, censorious, and out of touch. His AI, Grok, brands itself proudly anti-woke, and Musk himself has positioned his platforms (Twitter/X, Grok, and even Tesla’s cultural positioning) as a haven for free speech and techno-futurist nationalism.
Much too early to administer the last rites to Mr. Musk's American Party. it's not even begun. Don't underestimate the depth of disgust the American electorate has for the rigged electoral process. The American Party likely won't prevail but it could play the role of spoiler for whomever incurs its wrath.
Nevertheless it doesn't really matter in the grander scheme of things. Politics is theater performed by stage managed puppets for us lemmings to make us think we have a voice in matters. We don't. Henry Kissinger in one of his rare moments he was not lying stated "the world is run by 3,000 to 5,000 individuals". And we don't even know their names.
Wishing El9n Musk the very best.. May the forces of good and righteousness be with him as he endeavours to lead his adopted nation out of its malaise, its usurpation … I wish him, his supporters every success, may they clean house, take out the trash, ridding the nation of the detritus and filth that has plagued it for so long… end the Dollarcracy, Corptocracy, Finocracy, just rid from U.S politics the incessant money grubbing and grifting… return the nation to wealth from endeavour, entrepreneurship, hard work… rebuild the American dream…. Then watch it go global cleaning out the nefarious actors that have inculcated Western politics… Just saying
Regrettably, in this case, you are mistaken at the root, and I do not fault you for it. I too prefer to spend my time with philosophy and poetry rather than tracing the serpentine operations of the so-called PayPal Mafia. That is how they are known on Wall Street, and rightly so. These individuals, Peter Thiel and Elon Musk being the most prominent, are not natural-born Americans and, therefore, cannot legally run for the presidency of the United States, per Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. Thiel is German; Musk was born in South Africa. Both emerged from immense fortunes connected to the postcolonial extractivism of Africa.
While it is true that anyone can technically found a political party in the United States, regardless of birthplace or citizenship status, the constitutional requirement that only natural-born citizens are eligible to hold the presidency fundamentally undermines the legitimacy of any such party if it is clearly centered around foreign-born figures like Thiel or Musk. They may exert enormous influence, pour capital into political formations, or shape discourse through media and technology, but they themselves cannot legally become president, and this weakens the symbolic core of any political platform they might propose. Nor is it only a symbolic issue: Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations impose strict financial, legal, and residency requirements that further complicate attempts to institutionalize personalist or technocratic movements led by such figures.
They are not, as a rule, well-liked in America. We saw this clearly when JD Vance criticized Musk in the now-infamous Signal leaks, this sentiment is far from isolated. Despite the illusion of public support created by algorithms on platforms like Facebook and X, the PayPal clique is, in fact, viewed with suspicion or disdain across broad sectors of the American political spectrum.
America is not Europe, nor is it Russia. Political life in America operates according to a synergy of counter-forces, tensions that undermine sovereignty in order to make politics itself possible. This is the paradox at the heart of the American republic: sovereignty is both posited and continually eroded to give rise to a permanent space of agonistic political negotiation.
Right-wing libertarianism, as advocated by Thiel and his affiliates, is fundamentally incompatible with the Fourth Political Theory, which seeks to reclaim the political in its existential and civilizational dimensions. The PayPal Mafia’s objective is precisely the opposite: not to radicalize or deepen the political, but to eliminate it altogether. Thiel dreams of a post-political order, a technocratic utopia governed by algorithmic decisions, liberated from the vulgarities of electoral politics and bureaucracy. His model is closer to seasteading than to sovereignty.
This is precisely where he diverges from Soros Sr. George Soros, for all his contradictions, is a political animal. He understands the necessity of political conflict and invests in its perpetuation through chaos, non-linear change, and geopolitical acceleration. In contrast, Thiel is anti-political. He does not seek to conquer the state, but to obsolete it.
And yet now we see the return of an unlikely alliance: Thiel and Alexander Soros, Soros’s son, are reportedly cooperating again. One would think Russian intelligence would have long since infiltrated these emerging structures. And let us not forget: Soros Sr. still retains a significant stake in Palantir Technologies, despite Thiel's increasing autonomy over its strategic direction. This overlap is not anecdotal; it signals the strange post-liberal convergence of data-driven governance and globalist activism.
Within the Open Society Foundation itself, there have been internal revolts against the organization's indirect support for Thiel-adjacent initiatives. Nonetheless, this is the operational style of the new Soros: erratic, multipolar, unpredictable. Alexander Soros is not, like his father, primarily driven by financial logic. His aim is geopolitical transformation, and platforms like Palantir and Starlink have become fetish objects, technological totems, through which he seeks strategic leverage.
The idea of a PayPal Mafia Party is not new. It dates back to early 2025, when relations between Thiel’s network and Trumpism were still relatively amicable. JD Vance, the Appalachian populist lawyer turned senator, served as a key liaison between libertarian technocrats and Trump’s nationalist base. Those days are fading. The so-called America Party will be libertarian in a Sorosian sense, or it will not be at all.
As for Russia, it has only Trump left, and even that is becoming a fragile, ambivalent alliance. To abandon Trump entirely, merely because of four symbolic strikes on Iranian targets, would be an overreaction, especially considering the overtures he extended toward Moscow during his presidency. The idea that Trump could be discarded so easily ignores the deeper strategic interests he represented, and still could represent, for a Eurasian bloc in crisis.
If it's not a party for and lead by the American founding stock families, it's a party maintained by treasonous foreigners. Musk, and especially Thiel, represent the pinnacle of globalist forces with their technology that seeks to transform the world into an AI surveillance state, unified by transhumanist brain chips. Very clearly these people are enemies to our folk who must be rejected.
Spot on.
Interesting view. Who is not controled by the infrahumanist oligarchic globalists?
We appear to have lost everyone and everything some time in the late 1800s - early 1900s. There is no political solution. The only option is to colldctivize with members of your respective folk and develop self sufficuent homestead beyond the technological system.
Right. Much people, or some, are doing that. Many other still inhabit the cities, as they can work better there, but indeed within their montruosities...
Success in business almost never translates to success in politics. Musk and Theil are welded on to the military industrial complex, they are not agents of change , nor is Trump as you now admit , after pushing the theory that he was up until a month ago. Civilisational collapse is no respecter of persons, (or theories) it has it’s own inexorable logic.
Still civilizational collapse is caused by human beings, surely in a long time, and so it can be canged or transmuted throug human beings, the maximum myth of the are the avatars. Musk is a kind of alien avatar of our days...
The concept of the “Avatar” comes from the Hindu tradition in which it is linked to cosmic cycles of creation, maintenance and destruction. The rise and fall of civilisations is an insignificant cycle in these much larger cycles. It goes without saying the life of an individual human being is utterly insignificant. The conversations between Arjuna and Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita summarise this view of the powerlessness of men.
If you think a morally decrepit human being like Musk is an avatar, it is a sad reflection on your understanding of the term, which you perhaps got from it’s debased usage in computer gaming.
Mr Dugin I unfortunately think you're wrong on how subversive this seemingly "right wing" tech bros are, when push comes to shove all their care about is their companies and extracting as much money as they can from people. Inifinite Indian immigrants on cheap labour with visas tied to the company, and free trade being 2 areas very recently they've clearly gone against MAGA and the interests of the domestic population. They're hyper capitalists, sometimes they can LARP as America First, but really they're just big business first
they're kinda the ultimate globalists, they wish to create a globalist AI controlled superstate
I wrote a book about a third party in the USA more than 10 years ago. Now I have come to the conclusion that we need to transition away from politics as the answer. Especially centralized power in Washington is dangerous. Individual rights must be respected above an artificial state or corporation. This requires a stronger universal moral code. Some call this a nonaggression principle. No force, fraud or coercion allowed except in true self defense. This would effectively outlaw enforced taxes, large militaries, intrusions into one’s personal life. It would require a high level of cooperation among people for common infrastructure, etc.
Honestly, I don’t think a third party is really an American thing. If the U.S. ever wanted a real multi-party system, it would need a complete refoundation from the ground up. The way the system is built, first-past-the-post voting, the Electoral College, winner-takes-all districts, it’s designed to reinforce the two-party setup. Any third party that emerges ends up being absorbed, neutralized, or used to shift the balance inside one of the two big blocks. That’s just how the machine works.
This is the American state’s political bicycle: it moves forward on two wheels, Democrats and Republicans, always in motion, always leaning a little one way or the other, but never tipping over completely. Third parties don’t last long; they’re more like temporary pressure valves, symptoms of something the system can’t fully digest. We’ve seen this again and again: from the Populists to Perot to whatever Andrew Yang is trying now. Either they get swallowed, or they fade.
So yeah, the idea that Musk, Thiel, or whoever could build a lasting third force misunderstands how deep the institutional reflexes of the American system really go. If you really wanted to change that, you’d have to tear down and rebuild the whole framework. And that’s not on the table, not legally, not culturally, not even imaginatively, right now.
I agree that a third party is not really workable in America. What they can do is tilt a close race by joining forces with one of the major parties. Like RFK did in the recent election by joining Trump. In exchange he was put in charge of the health agencies. Other third parties refuse to join one party or the other. They do not leverage their position to deliver some votes to one party in exchange for a position of power in the next government. Instead they hope to start a movement, but fade away or remain a tiny fringe party with no influence. Another option is for a strong leader to come along and change the dynamics within a party for better or worse. I feel that real change comes from outside the parties. Then the two parties have to react or become less relevant. Of course ultimately they listen to their biggest donors. That’s why I stopped voting. Money talks and I don’t have millions or billions or own a corporation. I focus on moving toward a voluntaryist world.
That is for the net decades just a bright utopia. Mas is still so much in survival mood, that they easily become agressors. To become saints, or very ethic persons, are not objectives of tthe majorith...
Agree
This might be a rebellion against globalist control, but would world division into technates really be a better option for humanity? I don't think so.
(See what Peter Thiel is bragging about. Anyone bragging about producing more deadly weapons is so clearly a psychopath...)
The only good alternative for humanity is BRICS, i.e. cooperation among sovereign nations.
We don't need billionaires. They have too much money and it got into their head. We will have to disposses them of their filthy wealth and create a more fair society with lesser gaps between classes. It can be don, I know it from Yugoslavia. Gaps between rich and ordinary people were never as huge as in the West. From what I can see, gaps in Russia and China are also not so huge.
They are all the same.all look for absolut control tjey are palentir parents yes on the west you don't need a female to give birth🤣🤣🤣
Other “Third Parties” (Libertarian, Constitution, Green) already exist. The issue they all face is ballot access (something the two establishment parties conspired to make harder after Ron Paul and Ross Perot), debate access (the mainstream media can change the rules to disqualify or allow candidates at will), name recognition of candidates (Musk won’t be running), and money. Neither his fame nor money will solve three of those problems.
Shut up and talk about the jews controlling Russia, America, Australia, and Europe you charlatan Dugin.
Will the America party be a party for Americans, or just another party for the transnational moneylenders in power with either one of them, creating the money supply with each loan either in rubles in Russia or in USD in the USA, or soon with the CBDC of their central banks? I haven't seen Elon, Trump, Putin or Dugin take on that issue. While China keeps growing in wealth and strength because most of their banking system is state-controlled, and Germany remains subdued because their local not-for-profit Sparkassen make some 80 percent of their Euros. That is the religious question still unanswered.
Musk’s previous adventures were doomed to be failures, in practice they become an infinite resource of Finance Capita, why ? This the question Mr Dugin should have put to himself ! Musk isn’t a self made billionaire! Do some research Mr Dugin about Musk’s father and Mother , to start, then it would also be helpful to have some basic information about Finance Capital production and accumulation. Finally, Musk doesn’t own the billions that he is using to develop the most advanced, sophisticated psychological tools used by Finance Capital Investments for maximum Profit. We don’t live in a metaphysical dimension, we live in a material dimension in societies divided in classes where the ruling Elites don’t care a fig, don’t hold any compassionate feelings for the billions of People who are the real producers of any Nation Wealth. Let’s be honest for once! Musk, if ever gets to the helm of Power in America will be only at one condition: to serve the Zionist’s Dream of a World single government that will gradually reduce the world population to less than a billion; serving the privileged status of the “Chosen People” ! The Third World War is the Largest Financial Investment ever made by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Soros, Gates etc. Musk is going to be another Harlequin, hypocrite, ruthless and faithfully executing the Zionists’ Satanic Masonic Programme.
I feel humbled that “someone” ,have paid attention to my suffered reflection. I hold no ambitions in my life, it’s a stage reached after long, hard struggle against my main enemy, namely my self! I have become selfless, love life and feel alive only through my search for the Truth, our common Truth. In the Universe, the little we know about it , nothing appears to be divine, everything moves to the speed of light only to its own end! We deliberately choose to ignore the only TRUTH, THAT’S THE REASON, WE ARE JUST ANIMALS! ANIMALS WITH A BRAIN WE HARDLY USE.
Love him or loathe him, Musk has tapped into something real. His war on wokeism isn’t a PR gimmick—it’s a calculated rebellion against a liberal orthodoxy that has become increasingly rigid, censorious, and out of touch. His AI, Grok, brands itself proudly anti-woke, and Musk himself has positioned his platforms (Twitter/X, Grok, and even Tesla’s cultural positioning) as a haven for free speech and techno-futurist nationalism.
What the west needs is a french style revolution with millions of beheadings.
Much too early to administer the last rites to Mr. Musk's American Party. it's not even begun. Don't underestimate the depth of disgust the American electorate has for the rigged electoral process. The American Party likely won't prevail but it could play the role of spoiler for whomever incurs its wrath.
Nevertheless it doesn't really matter in the grander scheme of things. Politics is theater performed by stage managed puppets for us lemmings to make us think we have a voice in matters. We don't. Henry Kissinger in one of his rare moments he was not lying stated "the world is run by 3,000 to 5,000 individuals". And we don't even know their names.
Wishing El9n Musk the very best.. May the forces of good and righteousness be with him as he endeavours to lead his adopted nation out of its malaise, its usurpation … I wish him, his supporters every success, may they clean house, take out the trash, ridding the nation of the detritus and filth that has plagued it for so long… end the Dollarcracy, Corptocracy, Finocracy, just rid from U.S politics the incessant money grubbing and grifting… return the nation to wealth from endeavour, entrepreneurship, hard work… rebuild the American dream…. Then watch it go global cleaning out the nefarious actors that have inculcated Western politics… Just saying
Kia Kaha (stay strong) from New Zealand
Dear Professor Dugin:
Regrettably, in this case, you are mistaken at the root, and I do not fault you for it. I too prefer to spend my time with philosophy and poetry rather than tracing the serpentine operations of the so-called PayPal Mafia. That is how they are known on Wall Street, and rightly so. These individuals, Peter Thiel and Elon Musk being the most prominent, are not natural-born Americans and, therefore, cannot legally run for the presidency of the United States, per Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. Thiel is German; Musk was born in South Africa. Both emerged from immense fortunes connected to the postcolonial extractivism of Africa.
While it is true that anyone can technically found a political party in the United States, regardless of birthplace or citizenship status, the constitutional requirement that only natural-born citizens are eligible to hold the presidency fundamentally undermines the legitimacy of any such party if it is clearly centered around foreign-born figures like Thiel or Musk. They may exert enormous influence, pour capital into political formations, or shape discourse through media and technology, but they themselves cannot legally become president, and this weakens the symbolic core of any political platform they might propose. Nor is it only a symbolic issue: Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations impose strict financial, legal, and residency requirements that further complicate attempts to institutionalize personalist or technocratic movements led by such figures.
They are not, as a rule, well-liked in America. We saw this clearly when JD Vance criticized Musk in the now-infamous Signal leaks, this sentiment is far from isolated. Despite the illusion of public support created by algorithms on platforms like Facebook and X, the PayPal clique is, in fact, viewed with suspicion or disdain across broad sectors of the American political spectrum.
America is not Europe, nor is it Russia. Political life in America operates according to a synergy of counter-forces, tensions that undermine sovereignty in order to make politics itself possible. This is the paradox at the heart of the American republic: sovereignty is both posited and continually eroded to give rise to a permanent space of agonistic political negotiation.
Right-wing libertarianism, as advocated by Thiel and his affiliates, is fundamentally incompatible with the Fourth Political Theory, which seeks to reclaim the political in its existential and civilizational dimensions. The PayPal Mafia’s objective is precisely the opposite: not to radicalize or deepen the political, but to eliminate it altogether. Thiel dreams of a post-political order, a technocratic utopia governed by algorithmic decisions, liberated from the vulgarities of electoral politics and bureaucracy. His model is closer to seasteading than to sovereignty.
This is precisely where he diverges from Soros Sr. George Soros, for all his contradictions, is a political animal. He understands the necessity of political conflict and invests in its perpetuation through chaos, non-linear change, and geopolitical acceleration. In contrast, Thiel is anti-political. He does not seek to conquer the state, but to obsolete it.
And yet now we see the return of an unlikely alliance: Thiel and Alexander Soros, Soros’s son, are reportedly cooperating again. One would think Russian intelligence would have long since infiltrated these emerging structures. And let us not forget: Soros Sr. still retains a significant stake in Palantir Technologies, despite Thiel's increasing autonomy over its strategic direction. This overlap is not anecdotal; it signals the strange post-liberal convergence of data-driven governance and globalist activism.
Within the Open Society Foundation itself, there have been internal revolts against the organization's indirect support for Thiel-adjacent initiatives. Nonetheless, this is the operational style of the new Soros: erratic, multipolar, unpredictable. Alexander Soros is not, like his father, primarily driven by financial logic. His aim is geopolitical transformation, and platforms like Palantir and Starlink have become fetish objects, technological totems, through which he seeks strategic leverage.
The idea of a PayPal Mafia Party is not new. It dates back to early 2025, when relations between Thiel’s network and Trumpism were still relatively amicable. JD Vance, the Appalachian populist lawyer turned senator, served as a key liaison between libertarian technocrats and Trump’s nationalist base. Those days are fading. The so-called America Party will be libertarian in a Sorosian sense, or it will not be at all.
As for Russia, it has only Trump left, and even that is becoming a fragile, ambivalent alliance. To abandon Trump entirely, merely because of four symbolic strikes on Iranian targets, would be an overreaction, especially considering the overtures he extended toward Moscow during his presidency. The idea that Trump could be discarded so easily ignores the deeper strategic interests he represented, and still could represent, for a Eurasian bloc in crisis.
Is this a revolution of politic where finaly both left and right have no meaning ?